<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Venus is in the eye of the beholder	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2009/05/14/venus-is-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2009/05/14/venus-is-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 17:04:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: wispy		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2009/05/14/venus-is-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder/#comment-222572</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wispy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 17:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/14/venus-is-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder/#comment-222572</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[help please what is the full original name of this statue

??i cant find its name ?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>help please what is the full original name of this statue</p>
<p>??i cant find its name ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Aubrey		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2009/05/14/venus-is-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder/#comment-109476</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Aubrey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 14:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/14/venus-is-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder/#comment-109476</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hunters and gatherers go through feast and famine. Since meat can&#039;t well be stored--at least in the summer--you eat all you can and then have to go back out when the last of a big haul goes green.  Plant goods last better, but not for long and there is no indication in the Paleolithic of tools for working grain. So you got it when it was ripe and not otherwise.
But while things are good, there is, literally, nothing to do. There is no way to prepare for the future, no incentive to try to get ahead except with a few more blades.
So how do you pass the time?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hunters and gatherers go through feast and famine. Since meat can&#8217;t well be stored&#8211;at least in the summer&#8211;you eat all you can and then have to go back out when the last of a big haul goes green.  Plant goods last better, but not for long and there is no indication in the Paleolithic of tools for working grain. So you got it when it was ripe and not otherwise.<br />
But while things are good, there is, literally, nothing to do. There is no way to prepare for the future, no incentive to try to get ahead except with a few more blades.<br />
So how do you pass the time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Scottie		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2009/05/14/venus-is-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder/#comment-109468</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scottie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 11:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/14/venus-is-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder/#comment-109468</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Art tended to go through stylized phases over the course of history. Things were often just depicted the way they were because, well, that&#039;s the way it was done!

Look at Egyptian art and how it remained fairly consistent for long periods of time as a rough example of what I mean.

This figurine strikes me as a depiction that falls into that catagory. She was created in this manner because that&#039;s the way it was done as far back as anyone could remember, and continued to be done in the same manner for a very long time.

I suspect, as was referenced by another, that part of why she was depicted in this fashion originally was due to the crudity of materials and techniques that were employed, and keeping her as simple as possible ensured she stayed in one piece as long as possible with little breakage.

I&#039;d even go so far as to suspect that the figurine in question may even have originally had a head that simply broke off, and rather discard the figure some ancient someone just figured out how to attach a string to it and kept it.

Think of how many modern humans continue to hold onto items long after they are worn out or broken with the intent to &quot;fix them up&quot;.

If everything that was broken was simply discarded, hardware stores and auto supply shops would have closed down a long time ago.

The big unknown here is, what exactly was the intent of this depiction? Was it intended to glorify a concept (motherhood, fertility, good health, etc.), intended as a religious device for some sort for a goddess, or was it ancient porn?

Who knows?

The only ones who could definitively answer that question for us all died a long time ago.

So, IMO it&#039;s better to forget about absolute statements of what this figure means (it&#039;s just guessing anyway!) and simply enjoy the fact that we are in a position to appreciate the artistic efforts of a human being who spent a lot of time thousands of years ago to create this figurine, and after all this time she is still around to be appreciated.

We should all be so lucky as to leave such a mark on the world, even if it is now anonymous.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Art tended to go through stylized phases over the course of history. Things were often just depicted the way they were because, well, that&#8217;s the way it was done!</p>
<p>Look at Egyptian art and how it remained fairly consistent for long periods of time as a rough example of what I mean.</p>
<p>This figurine strikes me as a depiction that falls into that catagory. She was created in this manner because that&#8217;s the way it was done as far back as anyone could remember, and continued to be done in the same manner for a very long time.</p>
<p>I suspect, as was referenced by another, that part of why she was depicted in this fashion originally was due to the crudity of materials and techniques that were employed, and keeping her as simple as possible ensured she stayed in one piece as long as possible with little breakage.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d even go so far as to suspect that the figurine in question may even have originally had a head that simply broke off, and rather discard the figure some ancient someone just figured out how to attach a string to it and kept it.</p>
<p>Think of how many modern humans continue to hold onto items long after they are worn out or broken with the intent to &#8220;fix them up&#8221;.</p>
<p>If everything that was broken was simply discarded, hardware stores and auto supply shops would have closed down a long time ago.</p>
<p>The big unknown here is, what exactly was the intent of this depiction? Was it intended to glorify a concept (motherhood, fertility, good health, etc.), intended as a religious device for some sort for a goddess, or was it ancient porn?</p>
<p>Who knows?</p>
<p>The only ones who could definitively answer that question for us all died a long time ago.</p>
<p>So, IMO it&#8217;s better to forget about absolute statements of what this figure means (it&#8217;s just guessing anyway!) and simply enjoy the fact that we are in a position to appreciate the artistic efforts of a human being who spent a lot of time thousands of years ago to create this figurine, and after all this time she is still around to be appreciated.</p>
<p>We should all be so lucky as to leave such a mark on the world, even if it is now anonymous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mrs Whatsit		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2009/05/14/venus-is-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder/#comment-109464</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mrs Whatsit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 10:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/14/venus-is-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder/#comment-109464</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[JThoits, yes indeedy. See my 9:14 pm!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JThoits, yes indeedy. See my 9:14 pm!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SteveH		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2009/05/14/venus-is-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder/#comment-109463</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SteveH]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 09:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/14/venus-is-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder/#comment-109463</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There needs to be more discussion of this modern concept where ancient peoples are mythologised to the point of being held up as incredibly enlightened humans. 

  We do it with native Americans, Aztecs, cavemen and tribes in deep jungles. As though ignorance really is bliss and they had no dishonest a**holes among them to screw things up. As though they somehow restrained themselves from inventing indoor plumbing from some deep insight that their way of life was more fitting and correct for people.

 Well no. They lived the way they did from a lack of unleashing human imagination and creativity. Every single one of them would have traded all their arrowheads, primitive tools and baskets for an actual enlightened human to put a simple paper airplane in their hands.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There needs to be more discussion of this modern concept where ancient peoples are mythologised to the point of being held up as incredibly enlightened humans. </p>
<p>  We do it with native Americans, Aztecs, cavemen and tribes in deep jungles. As though ignorance really is bliss and they had no dishonest a**holes among them to screw things up. As though they somehow restrained themselves from inventing indoor plumbing from some deep insight that their way of life was more fitting and correct for people.</p>
<p> Well no. They lived the way they did from a lack of unleashing human imagination and creativity. Every single one of them would have traded all their arrowheads, primitive tools and baskets for an actual enlightened human to put a simple paper airplane in their hands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nolanimrod		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2009/05/14/venus-is-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder/#comment-109453</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nolanimrod]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 05:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/14/venus-is-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder/#comment-109453</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Wow!  Graphic depictions of the female form, with secondary sexual characteristics emphasized.

What do you suppose they were selling?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!  Graphic depictions of the female form, with secondary sexual characteristics emphasized.</p>
<p>What do you suppose they were selling?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JThoits		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2009/05/14/venus-is-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder/#comment-109439</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JThoits]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 02:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/14/venus-is-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder/#comment-109439</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Boy, this topic brings back my undergraduate days.  I did not have much of an art background before I took my art history class in 1978.   We spent two weeks looking at female/fertility figures.  I think I would have a much greater appreciation now then I did when I was 18.  

Is anyone else feeling a bit paranoid about grammar and word choice after yesterday&#039;s extended discussion?  I am frankly scared to death to attempt quotation marks or parentheses.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boy, this topic brings back my undergraduate days.  I did not have much of an art background before I took my art history class in 1978.   We spent two weeks looking at female/fertility figures.  I think I would have a much greater appreciation now then I did when I was 18.  </p>
<p>Is anyone else feeling a bit paranoid about grammar and word choice after yesterday&#8217;s extended discussion?  I am frankly scared to death to attempt quotation marks or parentheses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: nyomythus		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2009/05/14/venus-is-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder/#comment-109428</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nyomythus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 01:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/14/venus-is-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder/#comment-109428</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think in all the agony and sadness and emotion and pain -- something of a mystery no doubt produced extraordinary heart pounding awe.

Some of what I&#039;m getting from listening to this, but I dare say with such a mundane and regimented life I have, only a smidgen -- to come closer I would need more than a beauty and appreciation of a master phonometrician.

Satie: Trois Gnossiennes rendered via Moog
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gOlmef64nYI]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think in all the agony and sadness and emotion and pain &#8212; something of a mystery no doubt produced extraordinary heart pounding awe.</p>
<p>Some of what I&#8217;m getting from listening to this, but I dare say with such a mundane and regimented life I have, only a smidgen &#8212; to come closer I would need more than a beauty and appreciation of a master phonometrician.</p>
<p>Satie: Trois Gnossiennes rendered via Moog<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gOlmef64nYI" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gOlmef64nYI</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mrs Whatsit		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2009/05/14/venus-is-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder/#comment-109427</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mrs Whatsit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 01:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/14/venus-is-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder/#comment-109427</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Too, I mean. Goodness.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too, I mean. Goodness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mrs Whatsit		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2009/05/14/venus-is-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder/#comment-109425</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mrs Whatsit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 01:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2009/05/14/venus-is-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder/#comment-109425</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Do you think it came cheaply, nyomythus, or did they simply live in numinous wonderment? Or what would seem to us to be so? 

Maybe their artists seemed to them to be used car salesmen and hucksters, to. But I would prefer to think of them as you do, wondering over lines formed by a stick dragged through sand.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think it came cheaply, nyomythus, or did they simply live in numinous wonderment? Or what would seem to us to be so? </p>
<p>Maybe their artists seemed to them to be used car salesmen and hucksters, to. But I would prefer to think of them as you do, wondering over lines formed by a stick dragged through sand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
