I listen to him seasonally usually while I’m doing something else, take from him what I want to, and pretty much ignore his defects. It’s not really that difficult to seperate things out, but to each his own.

Regardless, he is not a “bad” man which Britain needs to protect itself from. What a joke.

Let’s see if Obama’s goons now try to take him out.

But as you point out, they don’t really have free speech over there as we understand it here in the states. I don’t think most people realize this.

I’ve seen Wilders’ film. It is accurate and truthful.

I haven’t listened to enough of Mr. Savage to render an informed opinion, but he is clearly not in the same league as terrorists, racists, and misogynists. Remember, Jaqui Smith is the same person who is in favor of Sharia Law in Britain and who demands that the words jihad and Islam never be associated with terrorism. She is an imbecile.

Mr. Savage is an entertainer, and if he is sometimes over the top rhetorically, I find I mostly agree with his views. On top of it all, he’s read the Qur’an. Ms. Smith has not. He knows more about Islam than she could possibly grasp.

In fact, if the standard is defense of Western Civilization against these 7th century savages, Mr. Weiner is the hero and Ms. Smith is an idiotic enabler of the enemy.

I’ve never listened to Savage, but once advertised I was immediately curious to find out more about what his views were.

It seems like it would be simpler and less totalitarian to just let everyone know the legal parameters of speech and behavior in your country and enforcing those laws after breaches occur rather than drawing up random lists of targeted individuals.