Think about what the Sixties meant — for people in Southeast Asia. For people in the Middle East. For people in South America. For people in Eastern Europe. These were not idyllic times, folks.

The Age of Aquarius types were not simply taking a vacation from history; they were ignoring what was going on in the world around them. (Did actions not have consequences in the rest of the world? Why should the United States be different?)

And we can see the pattern repeating today. Haven’t we seen prominent people make fools of themselves, by seeing strife in the world and thinking aloud that “we thought it would all be different once Obama was elected”?

The American people voted for Hope & Change, which knows no bounds; what they got was Barack Obama, who, unfortunately, must lead in the real world. We will see how that plays out.

respectfully,
Daniel in Brookline

You no think too good,
You no think too much.

Shoosh!

in other wrods, their discussions rarely go outside the realm of their own personal experience.

that the only reality worth talking about is the one that they exist in, and as if the universe came into being at that time, and so everything in front of them has an explanation that they can make up completely ignoreing that before they were born, there were a lto of thinkers, and a lot BETTER thinkers.

these new people stand on the shoulders of midgets and complain when others stand on the shoulders of giants.

look at the arguments of Recruiting Animal, they are all in the immediate…

why did these peopel suddenly claim to be different? waht influenced them. who declared “if it feels good do it”? what literature were they reading that changed their world? waht literature were they forbidden to read or deflected away from that allowed them to swallow crap so easily…

this is the difference between a true beliver socialist, and a reactionary.. the reactionary can only react to the history in front of them… the historian has the whole before them in context, and the socialist manipulates and lies to create a false one to move people around.

its interesting that if you give an IQ test to the people that complain most as to long texts and dry history, you will find that they are not that smart, but they have learned to appear smart by pretending to parrot the cliches and lines (as orwell said).

they swallow the whole false argumetn of class, in a country that has no roualty and so has no classes!!!

you can make up a term, and inject it into the converstation, and these people are so self confident as to their omniscient special knowlege from the ether, that they will “figure” out what it is and pretend to be knowlegeable way before they ever admit they dont know at all what its about!!!

one only has to look at the videos of people willing to sign to remove the pollutant hydrogen dioxide… (water)… or the girls willing to sign a petition to stop womens sufferage.

of course they think sufferage is suffering, and they never will admit that they are idiots and open a chance to learn. no… they will ridicule, and make jokes like too much caffeine.

and they managed to insulate themselves from any other message than one that si approved by their masters… the lords and ladies of PC.

after the idiots slap themselves on the back at how clever they are, they then get into their little bubble of the here and now, and analyse from no basis, and then are happy… of course they dont liek or attack with jokes anyone that might upset this, because their self worth is tied to their self esteem, and they have really nothing to justify the sefl esteem cause they are too lazy to read even a paragraph that appears too long.

why are things this way… because there are more idiots like this than smart noble people, and the smart nasty people use the idiots totheir own ends and dispose of them.

they are too dense to even understand that they are being turned into slaves.

The type and formula of most schemes of philanthropy or humanitarianism is this: A and B put their heads together to decide what C shall be made to do for D. The radical vice of all these schemes, from a sociological point of view, is that C is not allowed a voice in the matter, and his position, character, and interests, as well as the ultimate effects on society through C’s interests, are entirely overlooked. I call C the Forgotten Man. For once let us look him up and consider his case, for the characteristic of all social doctors is, that they fix their minds on some man or group of men whose case appeals to the sympathies and the imagination, and they plan remedies addressed to the particular trouble; they do not understand that all the parts of society hold together, and that forces which are set in action act and react throughout the whole organism, until an equilibrium is produced by a re-adjustment of all interests and rights. They therefore ignore entirely the source from which they must draw all the energy which they employ in their remedies, and they ignore all the effects on other members of society than the ones they have in view. They are always under the dominion of the superstition of government, and, forgetting that a government produces nothing at all, they leave out of sight the first fact to be remembered in all social discussion–that the State cannot get a cent for any man without taking it from some other man, and this latter must be a man who has produced and saved it. This latter is the Forgotten Man.

they think they are D, but they are C, and so they vote their own slavery!!!

and yet, they make fun of the others that would deliver them from their masters and make free individuals of them who could seek their own purpose.

is it any wonder that so many smart people change sides damning the idiots to their place because they WANT TO BE THERE!!! for those that didnt, wouldnt fight to preserve their ignorance so well.

Does anyone follow the stuff about Gen Y on the blogs. The Gen Y propaganda defines the boomers in the exact same way that they described their parents. They are authoritarian who want young people to do boring jobs.

But Gen Y won’t stand for it. We’ve been using computers since we were three, they say, and we’re going to change the world.

During the 60s, the people who claimed to be different from their parents actually had different lifestyles for awhile. That doesn’t seem to be the case now.

Also, when speaking about the “60s generation” we are talking about a small portion of the boomer population. Nixon won a landslide in 1972. If there were so many hippies and Marxists who voted for him? And, that year, 18 year olds were allowed to vote.

no… it was the path to socialism… the 60s was not a capitalis revolution… so it didnt lead to capitqalism..

see 180 degrees off and cant tell!

this was written in 52… BEFORE rock and roll invasion and large scale mass games! (do note the if you read this, and you were soviet, what would you think of rock and roll?)

If exposed long enough to the tomtoms and the singing, every one of our philosophers would end by capering and howling with savages. Assemble a mob of men and women, treat them to amplified band music, bright lights, and in next to no time you can reduce them to a state of almost mindless subhumanity. Never before have so few been in a position to make fools, maniacs, or criminals of so many aldous huxley (and i posted it twice in this thread since obviously almost no one read it the first time)

bush is a member of the oppressor class, and as such is open to any attack till there are no more people in the oppressor class

only death will suffice, one cant convert since one cant be reborn as another class – ergo, its always leads to extermination – funnier if you read the stuff from 1880s you realize that class is synonomous with royal rule. [of course the guitar playing hippy didnt read what i posted which woud have explained why he was a guitar playign hippy and what was dont to him… all laid out 20 years before the 60s! stadiums of people listening to rock and roll was first detailed by huxley, i gave the quote above)

there is no way to turn this around… period

why? because if you cant get these people to read these texts to understand the history, they will not read things like this.

It is very popular to pose as a “friend of humanity,” or a “friend of the working classes.” The character, however, is quite exotic in the United States. It is borrowed from England, where some men, otherwise of small account, have assumed it with great success and advantage. Anything which has a charitable sound and a kind-hearted tone generally passes without investigation, because it is disagreeable to assail it.

read sumner, and you fidn out the truth as to socialism, that its a means to power… and it ALWAYHS was…

but since we dont read dead white guyus… eveyone is self confident in the lies they know…

and their attention spans are so small, that they think my posts are large!!! when compared to the past, my posts are TINY…

i have only been able to post up 2 or three paragraphs from books that are 1000 pages long as an average… and these WHOLE books are as clear and easy to understand as the paragraph above.

so the missive of not reading the dead white guys is equivalent to book burning in hiding the truths and analysis in them.

welcome to the game…

…Now how do you plan on translating those pretty words into reality? What are the details?” I didn’t see too many on the Left asking that before November. They’re starting to, as is the press. But too little too late. We’re stuck with our prize for the next four years.