<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Now &#8216;&#8221;Socialist&#8221; is just a code word for Black, even if the Black person happens to be a Socialist	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2008/10/22/now-socialist-is-just-a-code-word-for-black-even-if-the-black-person-happens-to-be-a-socialist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2008/10/22/now-socialist-is-just-a-code-word-for-black-even-if-the-black-person-happens-to-be-a-socialist/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2014 13:55:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Mohamed		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2008/10/22/now-socialist-is-just-a-code-word-for-black-even-if-the-black-person-happens-to-be-a-socialist/#comment-765560</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mohamed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2014 13:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2008/10/22/now-socialist-is-just-a-code-word-for-black-even-if-the-black-person-happens-to-be-a-socialist/#comment-765560</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nice try, but you completely omit the CONCLUSION.  Seems a bit inportamt if you want to argue tax policy differences.C. Comparison of the Two PlansIn 2009, Senator Obama&#039;s plan would reduce the effective marginal tax rate for far more households than would the McCain plan. This is true both overall, and for all income classes....In fact, the Obama plan would raise marginal rates for about three-quarters of taxpayers making more than $1 million whereas the McCain plan would leave rates unchanged for 95 percent of those taxpayers (figure 2). Overall, the Obama plan would raise EMTRs for 15 percent of taxpayers, compared with only 1 percent for the McCain plan.I also note they make no mention of taxing health care benefits as McCain has proposed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice try, but you completely omit the CONCLUSION.  Seems a bit inportamt if you want to argue tax policy differences.C. Comparison of the Two PlansIn 2009, Senator Obama&#8217;s plan would reduce the effective marginal tax rate for far more households than would the McCain plan. This is true both overall, and for all income classes&#8230;.In fact, the Obama plan would raise marginal rates for about three-quarters of taxpayers making more than $1 million whereas the McCain plan would leave rates unchanged for 95 percent of those taxpayers (figure 2). Overall, the Obama plan would raise EMTRs for 15 percent of taxpayers, compared with only 1 percent for the McCain plan.I also note they make no mention of taxing health care benefits as McCain has proposed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ear Infection Treatment :		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2008/10/22/now-socialist-is-just-a-code-word-for-black-even-if-the-black-person-happens-to-be-a-socialist/#comment-194880</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ear Infection Treatment :]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2010 14:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2008/10/22/now-socialist-is-just-a-code-word-for-black-even-if-the-black-person-happens-to-be-a-socialist/#comment-194880</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[labor relations must be maintained in a very positive level among the corpoarte owners and employees-*&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>labor relations must be maintained in a very positive level among the corpoarte owners and employees-*&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Aidan Webb		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2008/10/22/now-socialist-is-just-a-code-word-for-black-even-if-the-black-person-happens-to-be-a-socialist/#comment-173265</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aidan Webb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 13:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2008/10/22/now-socialist-is-just-a-code-word-for-black-even-if-the-black-person-happens-to-be-a-socialist/#comment-173265</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[in order to have good busines practice, good labor relations is very important.,,-]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in order to have good busines practice, good labor relations is very important.,,-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kirk Petersen		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2008/10/22/now-socialist-is-just-a-code-word-for-black-even-if-the-black-person-happens-to-be-a-socialist/#comment-90824</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kirk Petersen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 22:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2008/10/22/now-socialist-is-just-a-code-word-for-black-even-if-the-black-person-happens-to-be-a-socialist/#comment-90824</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m piling in late here, but I just &lt;a href=&quot;http://kirkpete.blogspot.com/2008/11/no-its-not-racial-code.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;blogged about&lt;/a&gt; an even more absurd reference to racial code, on a Slate podcast:

&quot;A lot of voters... when you talk about experience with respect to Obama, that&#039;s &lt;b&gt;code for people&#039;s continuing uncomfortableness about his race&lt;/b&gt;... a lot of times when people talk about worries about his experience, they&#039;re really touching against their difficulty with the fact that he&#039;s an African-American.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m piling in late here, but I just <a href="http://kirkpete.blogspot.com/2008/11/no-its-not-racial-code.html" rel="nofollow">blogged about</a> an even more absurd reference to racial code, on a Slate podcast:</p>
<p>&#8220;A lot of voters&#8230; when you talk about experience with respect to Obama, that&#8217;s <b>code for people&#8217;s continuing uncomfortableness about his race</b>&#8230; a lot of times when people talk about worries about his experience, they&#8217;re really touching against their difficulty with the fact that he&#8217;s an African-American.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: scottie		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2008/10/22/now-socialist-is-just-a-code-word-for-black-even-if-the-black-person-happens-to-be-a-socialist/#comment-90281</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scottie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 22:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2008/10/22/now-socialist-is-just-a-code-word-for-black-even-if-the-black-person-happens-to-be-a-socialist/#comment-90281</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well,  I wasn&#039;t in a position these past couple of days to pay close attention to this site so I almost missed this last comment - but I gotta respond one last time.

Seanithan,

The quote you gave was from the second presidential debate - by your own admission.

That particular debate took place on Oct. 7, 2008 I believe?

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN07477465

The quote I gave was from the democrat primary debates - from around August 1, 2007.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/01/AR2007080101233.html

Again, it&#039;s an iterative argument where initial statements are &quot;massaged&quot; over time to change the initial meaning to something more palatable.

I&#039;m done stirring this particular pot now....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well,  I wasn&#8217;t in a position these past couple of days to pay close attention to this site so I almost missed this last comment &#8211; but I gotta respond one last time.</p>
<p>Seanithan,</p>
<p>The quote you gave was from the second presidential debate &#8211; by your own admission.</p>
<p>That particular debate took place on Oct. 7, 2008 I believe?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN07477465" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN07477465</a></p>
<p>The quote I gave was from the democrat primary debates &#8211; from around August 1, 2007.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/01/AR2007080101233.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/01/AR2007080101233.html</a></p>
<p>Again, it&#8217;s an iterative argument where initial statements are &#8220;massaged&#8221; over time to change the initial meaning to something more palatable.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m done stirring this particular pot now&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: wozza		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2008/10/22/now-socialist-is-just-a-code-word-for-black-even-if-the-black-person-happens-to-be-a-socialist/#comment-90023</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wozza]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 16:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2008/10/22/now-socialist-is-just-a-code-word-for-black-even-if-the-black-person-happens-to-be-a-socialist/#comment-90023</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ok, living in europe, and being a &quot;european socialist&quot; myself i can categorically state that Obama is not a Socialist.

Socialists believe in state healthcare and education - obama does not, obama believes in health insurance where the government pays for treatment in a mix of facilities and private education as part of a capitalist economy. 

Socialists believe in a mixed economy (as opposed to Communists who beleieve in total government/public ownership) where a combination of production/resources/transit/energy are owned and operated by the government on behalf of the public. Obama - as far as i am aware, is not in favour of nationalising the energy industries/natural resources or means of production in the united states. 

What Obama is guilty of is favouring a progressive tax system - which even (small c) Conservative parties in the majority of Europe are in support of, although by many standards most of the centre-right parties in Europe (using our spectrum) would be Democrat affiliates using the American spectrum.

But - Obama is not a socialist, end of story - support of progressive taxation is not the sole tenat of socialism.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok, living in europe, and being a &#8220;european socialist&#8221; myself i can categorically state that Obama is not a Socialist.</p>
<p>Socialists believe in state healthcare and education &#8211; obama does not, obama believes in health insurance where the government pays for treatment in a mix of facilities and private education as part of a capitalist economy. </p>
<p>Socialists believe in a mixed economy (as opposed to Communists who beleieve in total government/public ownership) where a combination of production/resources/transit/energy are owned and operated by the government on behalf of the public. Obama &#8211; as far as i am aware, is not in favour of nationalising the energy industries/natural resources or means of production in the united states. </p>
<p>What Obama is guilty of is favouring a progressive tax system &#8211; which even (small c) Conservative parties in the majority of Europe are in support of, although by many standards most of the centre-right parties in Europe (using our spectrum) would be Democrat affiliates using the American spectrum.</p>
<p>But &#8211; Obama is not a socialist, end of story &#8211; support of progressive taxation is not the sole tenat of socialism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Seanithan		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2008/10/22/now-socialist-is-just-a-code-word-for-black-even-if-the-black-person-happens-to-be-a-socialist/#comment-89994</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seanithan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 06:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2008/10/22/now-socialist-is-just-a-code-word-for-black-even-if-the-black-person-happens-to-be-a-socialist/#comment-89994</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[election = debate, sorry.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>election = debate, sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Seanithan		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2008/10/22/now-socialist-is-just-a-code-word-for-black-even-if-the-black-person-happens-to-be-a-socialist/#comment-89992</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seanithan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 05:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2008/10/22/now-socialist-is-just-a-code-word-for-black-even-if-the-black-person-happens-to-be-a-socialist/#comment-89992</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;And if we have Osama bin Laden in our sights and the Pakistani government is unable or unwilling to take them out, then I think that we have to act and we will take them out. We will kill bin Laden; we will crush Al Qaeda. That has to be our biggest national security priority.&quot;

That is the exact quote from the 2nd Presidential election, taken from CNN.com. There&#039;s an if there, I&#039;m pretty sure.

I realize common sense depends on one viewpoint, thus I&#039;m stating mine. I didn&#039;t presume to speak for the world.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And if we have Osama bin Laden in our sights and the Pakistani government is unable or unwilling to take them out, then I think that we have to act and we will take them out. We will kill bin Laden; we will crush Al Qaeda. That has to be our biggest national security priority.&#8221;</p>
<p>That is the exact quote from the 2nd Presidential election, taken from CNN.com. There&#8217;s an if there, I&#8217;m pretty sure.</p>
<p>I realize common sense depends on one viewpoint, thus I&#8217;m stating mine. I didn&#8217;t presume to speak for the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: br549		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2008/10/22/now-socialist-is-just-a-code-word-for-black-even-if-the-black-person-happens-to-be-a-socialist/#comment-89965</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[br549]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 01:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2008/10/22/now-socialist-is-just-a-code-word-for-black-even-if-the-black-person-happens-to-be-a-socialist/#comment-89965</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There are some commenters here, aside from neo, who should perhaps write a book. I have never been an eloquent writer, ever been able to put my thoughts just right.  Many in here are and do. This is a fine blog.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are some commenters here, aside from neo, who should perhaps write a book. I have never been an eloquent writer, ever been able to put my thoughts just right.  Many in here are and do. This is a fine blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: scottie		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2008/10/22/now-socialist-is-just-a-code-word-for-black-even-if-the-black-person-happens-to-be-a-socialist/#comment-89950</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scottie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 00:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2008/10/22/now-socialist-is-just-a-code-word-for-black-even-if-the-black-person-happens-to-be-a-socialist/#comment-89950</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Seanithan,

Obama never qualified his statement with any &quot;IF&quot; - I gave you the exact quote, but instead of admitting you have been misled (or are deliberately attempting to mislead) you continue to qualify your statements (and supposed quotes of Obama) with one baseless new iteration after another.

If there is such a thing as an unbiased voter around here, they would do well to observe your behaviour closely so they can identify and discount such iterative arguments in the future.

Oh, and what passes for &quot;common sense&quot; depends entirely on one&#039;s viewpoint - again, your post being an object lesson. I think I&#039;ll stick with Kissinger on this one....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seanithan,</p>
<p>Obama never qualified his statement with any &#8220;IF&#8221; &#8211; I gave you the exact quote, but instead of admitting you have been misled (or are deliberately attempting to mislead) you continue to qualify your statements (and supposed quotes of Obama) with one baseless new iteration after another.</p>
<p>If there is such a thing as an unbiased voter around here, they would do well to observe your behaviour closely so they can identify and discount such iterative arguments in the future.</p>
<p>Oh, and what passes for &#8220;common sense&#8221; depends entirely on one&#8217;s viewpoint &#8211; again, your post being an object lesson. I think I&#8217;ll stick with Kissinger on this one&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
