“What’s the difference between a PUMA and a cougar?

About three Cosmos at the Denver Sheraton Hotel bar.”

Some, yes. Their cognative dissonance isn’t so great, and reality may peak thru their clouded vision.

Most of the rest? no, not a chance. Not until they’ve been beaten bloody and left for dead[1] by their so-called allies with they get it.

[1] metaphorically beaten and left for dead, of course.

“Probably not – that is their game also. There will be some, and I think this election will have more than normal, that reexamine their beliefs from this but it will be rare.”

Well, maybe not all the fringe feminists but a lot of Hillary people were blue collar Reagan Democrat types. As a group they’ve been on the fence for 30 years, or more, ready to move over…

Also, I think groups have ‘centers of gravity’ so to speak. If you’re hanging out with lunatics it can bring out your crazy side. If you hang out with people who demand facts, arguments that make sense, et cetera it forces you to straighten out… So, even some radicals can normal out if they switch sides. On that note, US conservatism was largely founded by ex communists (like 80% of the early leaders) and then in part populated with waves of other leftists who switched sides (Reagan, the dred neocons, et cetera)… It could just be another (abet small) wave / influx…

Mrs. Robinson in “The Graduate” was the quintessential cougar. I wrote about her here.

“Finally, it must never be forgotten, especially in an age of upheaval and disillusionment, that American democracy rests squarely on the assumption of a pious, honest, self-disciplined, moral people. … Whatever doubts may exist about the sources of this democracy, there can be none about the chief source of the morality that gives it life and substance. From Puritanism, from the way of life that exalted individual responsibility, came those homely rules of everyday conduct — or, if we must, those rationalizations of worldly success — that have molded the American mind into its unique shape. … The men of 1776 believed that the good state would rise on the rock of private and public morality, that morality was in the case of most men and all states the product of religion, and that the earthly mission of religion was to set men free.” – Clinton Rossiter

guess we are screwed right? after all we left the socialists change the thing that supported the foudnations of our once great nation.

the hillary supporters are only upset because it will not be their brand of gender marxism that will dominate, and give them more power, but more of an economic social justice marxism (with race marxism and Bnazi ideas).

however, russia unlike all the other socialist states, wishes mccain to be president not obama, and is doing a whole lot to insure that someone of action that can play into their hands is in office.

[strategecally russia is in a bad place. either they do something now, or there wont be enough left of them in 20 odd years to do much of anything. its the last desperate hoorah of a nation state who backed the wrong horse till the bitter end]

Russia warns Moldova against “Georgian mistake”
http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSLP59197620080825

the real imperalists of the modern era are on the move again… [only one country ended up with more territory after wwii. Russia. everyone else either remained the same or lost land to russia]

hillary supporters and obama supporters think this is the time for full blown socialism, and so both want to be in office when the crisis they both know is going to hit.

in their minds they are battling to be the first communist president of the united states. (change)

there is a much bigger picture starting up, and its going to take advantage of our sharing and gutting ourselves to be friends.

mccain is wanted because mccain will create a real conflict, and a real conflict will prevent products from moving from china to the US wihout blame. our economy will take a huge hit and there wont be the money or expertise to produce, like in WWII.

we are in a bad place, and the opposition that has continuously swore our end, is in a win or lose everything position (given their paranoia).

contrary to popular belief, they make lots in war, we lose a lot. america does not make lots of money from wars they are in, we lose huge productivity and we lose our freedoms.

we make more, and live much better in stable peace time.

and megalomaniacs love the idea of war since it feathers their nest, puts them in the history books, and gives them maximal power to effect ‘change’.

the next 10 years will be scary…

“My guess is there will be a lot of profound thinking among the Dems after the elections…”

I’m sorry, but you have to already know that isnt possible. There wont be any thinking whatsoever, much less approaching profound.

There will be anger. There will be recrimination. There will be victimhood, vilification and irrational lashing out. The last thing there will ever, ever, ever be is profound thinking.

Good.