Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.

But if thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought.
George Orwell

Political chaos is connected with the decay of language… one can probably bring about some improvement by starting at the verbal end.

Political language… is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.

It is almost universally felt that when we call a country democratic we are praising it; consequently, the defenders of every kind of regime claim that it is a democracy, and fear that they might have to stop using the word if it were tied down to any one meaning.

The nationalist not only does not disapprove of atrocities committed by his own side, he has a remarkable capacity for not even hearing about them.

The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it.

The great enemy of clear language is insincerity. When there is a gap between one’s real and one’s declared aims, one turns, as it were, instinctively to long words and exhausted idioms, like a cuttlefish squirting out ink.

Myths which are believed in tend to become true.

Doublethink means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them.

[this is something the soviets created, as well as the nazis, and our current propaganda. it allows a man to be a brute in a concentration camp, then come home to be what appears to be a great parent. they are politically schizophrenic like most of the left today who can hold conflicting things in mind and not notice them or have dissonance from them. ]

orwell again – In our age there is no such thing as ‘keeping out of politics.’ All issues are political issues, and politics itself is a mass of lies, evasions, folly, hatred and schizophrenia.

Investigation into the Soviet Union, Lenin and Stalin requires a lot of work, patience, and perusal of literature and sources(which are not made easily accessible by historians in the service of imperialism). Majority of the time, the historians omit the primary and necessary sources from the public, and the public simply relies on what the historians have to say, without even realizing there is a vast amount of information out there that gives quite another picture of reality.

anyway… back to orwell quotes.

Liberal: a power worshipper without power

All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others

All political thinking for years past has been vitiated in the same way. People can foresee the future only when it coincides with their own wishes, and the most grossly obvious facts can be ignored when they are unwelcome.

All the war-propaganda, all the screaming and lies and hatred, comes invariably from people who are not fighting.

As with the Christian religion, the worst advertisement for Socialism is its adherents.

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.

Early in life I had noticed that no event is ever correctly reported in a newspaper.

Freedom is the right to tell people what they do not want to hear

If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face – forever.

Men can only be happy when they do not assume that the object of life is happiness.

No advance in wealth, no softening of manners, no reform or revolution has ever brought human equality a millimeter nearer

Patriotism is usually stronger than class hatred, and always stronger than internationalism.

So much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don’t even know that fire is hot.

The atom bombs are piling up in the factories, the police are prowling through the cities, the lies are streaming from the loudspeakers, but the earth is still going round the sun.

To survive it is often necessary to fight and to fight you have to dirty yourself.

War is a way of shattering to pieces… materials which might otherwise be used to make the masses too comfortable and… too intelligent.

We sleep safe in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm.

What can you do against the lunatic who is more intelligent than yourself, who gives your arguments a fair hearing and then simply persists in his lunacy?

by promoting that the labels are everything and material is nothing, they get to change the material, by chaning its label.

its easy to demonstrate with restaurants.

you open a restaurant and you have char broiled, steak smothered in onions and mushrooms on the menu.

another store has the same exact dish, except that they call it burnt dead cow with burnt vegetables scorched in animal fat rendered for the purpose.

the material has stayed the same, the label has changed it.

so the negro project later became planned parenthood, when the democrats found out that most people didnt want to exterminate the blacks. so they reformed it, and repackaged it, but it still has the same purpose of eugenics, but a softer one.

heck… how about liberal… liberal used to be on the right… but it became progressive, then neo liberal, and all kinds of name changes. meanwhile, they are what they have been since the communists took them over, and the socialist party stopped running for president as they said “there was no way to distinguish their platform from the dmocrats”.

this is all part and parcel of the soviet system (of which we have been copying!!)

i explained this before, but peopel dont seem to get it.

the name changes are about getting material, people, to move the way that the controllers want them to.

they first picked the negro project because they thought that people would side with their program outright… hitler wrote for advice to the feminist heroes organization for his programs.

however, with hitler doing what they were talking about, the tide changes, and so they change theirname.

the controller doesnt care what the horses actually think as long as they move and dance to their tune.

name changes are a part of that. it makes the history too hard to follow, it allows a democratic party who hated blacks, to suddenly become the party of the blacks because they bait the moustrap with cheese. to the mouse the person putting cheese in the moustrap looks better and kinder than the person who refuses to give any cheese.

here is the most classic example.
the cheka became the OGPU, then NKGB, MGB, MVD, KGB, and now the FSB…

the organization has not really changed, but its name changes always went with a new polish that often wore off too quickly.

all this is about making the horses move where they want to so that the horses plait the rope that they will use to hang them with.

heck a great example of name games is Southern Conference Education Fund, SCEF

to quote one of the people…

“Dr. Dombrowski told me on several occasions that he preferred to be called a Left Socialist rather than a Communist; that he could serve the revolutionary movement better under the Socialist label than the Communist label.” – dombrowski

labels mean nothing… and chaning them as part of the game means everything.

Working with Dombrowski in SCEF is its Field Secretary, Carl Braden. In 1954 Braden was convicted and sentenced to fifteen years in prison for bombing the home of a Negro who had just moved into a white neighborhood and for attempting to place the blame on the Caucasian neighbors. Braden was released from jail when the Warren court declared all state sedition laws void.

“Carl Braden was a national sponsor of the notorious Fair Play For Cuba Committee which spawned the assassinator of President John F. Kennedy, Marxist Lee Harvey Oswald.”

anyway, want to see how effective name games can be?

well, ministers are VERY big in communism of the blacks… from sangers quotes to using them, to their history.

The President of SCEF is the Reverend Fred Shuttlesworth, an ex-convict who according to federal government files has been involved in seven Communist-front activities since 1960. The interlocking structure which pervades the entire civil rights movement is demonstrated here by the fact that Shuttlesworth serves as a link between the Communist SCEF and Martin Luther King’s organization, the Southern Christian Leadership Conference. Shuttlesworth is Vice President of King’s organization.
The Reverend Shuttlesworth replaced Aubrey Williams as President of SCEF. Williams until his recent death was also Chairman of the National Committee to Abolish the House Un-American Activities Committee, (sic), a Communist front of which Martin Luther King is a leading member. The Chairman of this Committee is Frank Wilkinson, who has been identified, in sworn testimony by an undercover FBI agent, as a member of the Communist Party.

so with all the label games, and lies going on… the meanings disappear or change.

waht is the meaning of “rights” today, when people use the term for everything EXCEPT rights?

heck.. look at christine quinn using false charities (FRONTS), to take tax monies and store them for her games… somethign that the dems have been doing for ages… but now suddenly, you can see so many of them getting caught its ridiculous… but the newspapers are careful not to put their (D) next to their names…

According to city records, allocations in the City Council’s 2006 budget include $300,000 to “The Association of Community Partners,” $150,000 to “Moving Up, Building Bridges,” and $300,000 to “The American Association of Concerned Veterans,” among others. The fifteen shell organizations were slated to receive a total of $2.57 million for the 2006 fiscal year.

welcome to babel.

Try link again above. Now below with /a:

They were also called “Colored people”, like by the NAACP. Or, less politely coloreds. Or more racistly, the n* word (the NewSpeak Obscenity?).

But Negroes were disproportionately poor.

So “Negro” made way for Black in 1968, with the Mexico Olympics (and Lew Alcindor, like Cassius Clay, changing his name as he became a Black Muslim). Black Power.

But Blacks were disproportionately poor, and so were Colored People, and Americans of African descent, and People of Color, and Afro-Americans.

(I would guess most churchgoers to Minister Wright’s sermons were “poor”, too — despite Barack’s attendence)

No new label will change the problem of disproportionate poverty, or homes with children but without fathers. Only cultural behavior change — and it is to avoid behavior change that the liberals want to change the labels.

The label name is also an issue in Congestion Pricing, or Road Pricing, or the EcoPass:

Same with born again Christians: they tell everything in plain language with no euphemisms or “cover up” language.

It’s only bad, bad, bad, bad liberals who make up euphemisms to cover up….

Yay!

“I would dare say that these days, the greater problem with self esteem is that too many kids have too HIGH self esteem, and are far too inflated with their own importance.”

Ah, future democrat voters. “Dumbing them down” first wont be a huge difficulty, as OsoGrizzly above had mentioned, dumbing down by now must be second nature.

Some of us conservative extremist like the idea of merit pay and promotions, but hey, that idea upsets the teachers unions currently supported by liberal voters.

You know, some of the most elitist liberals like to arrogantly pretend that Americans with actual values, (us extremists again I suppose), cling to meaningless issues rather than to get enlightened and vote against our own economic self-interests.

Then you have these liberals that purposely choose to opt into an educational status quo that creates more parents glued to the cycle.

Now, this arrangement might very well suit the elitist John Kerry and Barack Hussien Obama wing of the democrat party, (the socialist aristocrats); a dumb electorate, dependant upon politicians, bureaucrats and academic types for how they should live their lives, but me, I dont look forward to this version of Utopia and would rather “cling” to the original intent of our founding fathers.

Its not that I may not need a master, Id much prefer to make that decision myself.

I hope I havent offended any “moderates” or “independents” here.

One thing I learned was that all of us have different levels of talents and skills. We can improve our talents and skills by practice and application, but only a few will rise to the top in any game, career, artistic endeavour, etc. So, if we cannot be the best, should we consider ourselves failures and have low self esteem? Of course not. Gallwey said we must learn to understand that our very best effort may fall short, but as long as we give our best effort we have succeeded. And that is what our children should learn in school. To kid ourselves about these things is to develop an inability to cope with life as it really is. When everyone doesn’t give the best they have, or think they are giving it, the performance of individuals and organizations trends downward.

He also taught that we do no favors to anyone by relaxing standards. When you play someone in tennis that is not as good as you, you are not doing any favors by easing up on your game. By playing your best, you are actually helping your opponent raise his/her game. Everyone working to do their best raises everyone’s standards.

I find this to be true for me when I work with a personal trainer. He keeps pushing me and never lets me off easy. I hate it, but I know his pushing me is really a good thing, because it is improving my fitness beyond what I would do on my own.

I also learned from Tim’s book to quit comparing myself to others. If you do that you will be either vain or bitter, for there will always be people greater or lesser than yourself. What matters is to be true to yourself and always try to do your best. If our children can learn that, they will not have self esteem problems.

“But it never achieves its goals, because meaning is usage, and newly invented replacements soon aquire all stink and stigma of their precursors.”

True… I’ve seen it several times with games over political labels.