<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Mitt, we hardly knew ya	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2008/02/07/mitt-we-hardly-knew-ya/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2008/02/07/mitt-we-hardly-knew-ya/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 01:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: scot		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2008/02/07/mitt-we-hardly-knew-ya/#comment-57076</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2008/02/07/mitt-we-hardly-knew-ya/#comment-57076</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As to Donaldson,

Why is anyone even listening to this obvious bigot! The anti mormanism he spews is in no way different from the anti semetism out there. 

If you disagree with his believes Donaldson then dont get baptised into his church but leave it out of Political debate. 

Bringing it up only shows your bias and hate. Giving people like me more reason not to back a guy for pres that has the support of people like you. Same reason why i will not get be hind Huck. His bigoted remarks about Romneys religion was disgracful and his followers are just as bad.

Makes me sad to see in this party. I thought this kind of hate was a thing of the left not the right. I have found this political season that that is not the case. I for one am ashamed!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As to Donaldson,</p>
<p>Why is anyone even listening to this obvious bigot! The anti mormanism he spews is in no way different from the anti semetism out there. </p>
<p>If you disagree with his believes Donaldson then dont get baptised into his church but leave it out of Political debate. </p>
<p>Bringing it up only shows your bias and hate. Giving people like me more reason not to back a guy for pres that has the support of people like you. Same reason why i will not get be hind Huck. His bigoted remarks about Romneys religion was disgracful and his followers are just as bad.</p>
<p>Makes me sad to see in this party. I thought this kind of hate was a thing of the left not the right. I have found this political season that that is not the case. I for one am ashamed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: scot		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2008/02/07/mitt-we-hardly-knew-ya/#comment-57072</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2008/02/07/mitt-we-hardly-knew-ya/#comment-57072</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It just goes to show the amount  of BullShit that voters focus on. He has slick hair so he must be a slick liar. Voters in a democratic republic have to be intellectual. We have to school ourselves in Government and the candidates. That my friend is the problems with people today. Too many vote on perception or looks and not on content. 

Take McCain supports for example. Name one thing other than his hero status McCain has done good that is conservative. Did anyone watch the same debates I watched? This is what i saw; Commentator: &quot;So McCain what is your stance on the economy&quot;. McCain: “I was a POW and supported the surge&quot;. Commentator: &quot; how about Immigration&quot;. McCain: &quot;I was a POW and I voted for the surge, and would vote for the amnesty bill if it came up but it wont come up because i got my shit handed to me by the American people...but i still would vote for it.&quot; 

In response to calling Mitt a Flip flopper that moved conservative from a liberal conservative from Mass. I say this. I’d rather vote for a guy that is a liberal conservative from a liberal state than a liberal conservative from a conservative state. Keep that in mind.

A brokered convention is our best hope of getting a decent candidate!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It just goes to show the amount  of BullShit that voters focus on. He has slick hair so he must be a slick liar. Voters in a democratic republic have to be intellectual. We have to school ourselves in Government and the candidates. That my friend is the problems with people today. Too many vote on perception or looks and not on content. </p>
<p>Take McCain supports for example. Name one thing other than his hero status McCain has done good that is conservative. Did anyone watch the same debates I watched? This is what i saw; Commentator: &#8220;So McCain what is your stance on the economy&#8221;. McCain: “I was a POW and supported the surge&#8221;. Commentator: &#8221; how about Immigration&#8221;. McCain: &#8220;I was a POW and I voted for the surge, and would vote for the amnesty bill if it came up but it wont come up because i got my shit handed to me by the American people&#8230;but i still would vote for it.&#8221; </p>
<p>In response to calling Mitt a Flip flopper that moved conservative from a liberal conservative from Mass. I say this. I’d rather vote for a guy that is a liberal conservative from a liberal state than a liberal conservative from a conservative state. Keep that in mind.</p>
<p>A brokered convention is our best hope of getting a decent candidate!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike M		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2008/02/07/mitt-we-hardly-knew-ya/#comment-56799</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 14:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2008/02/07/mitt-we-hardly-knew-ya/#comment-56799</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Donald,

Again. So if a McCain/Hillary/Huckabee/whomever who happens to be Catholic or Evangelical doesn&#039;t &quot;admit&quot; that he doesn&#039;t believe Christ rose from the dead, that he doesn&#039;t admit as you say: &quot;these less than rational notions&quot; then he will say what ever he thinks the audience wants to hear?

Components of all religions are &quot;less than rational&quot; and yet we don&#039;t force our candidates to admit as much. The fact that you would list a few of the Mormon ones and think that proves anything shows that you are not going to accept a Mormon, end of story. You must think Christian beliefs are completely rational.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donald,</p>
<p>Again. So if a McCain/Hillary/Huckabee/whomever who happens to be Catholic or Evangelical doesn&#8217;t &#8220;admit&#8221; that he doesn&#8217;t believe Christ rose from the dead, that he doesn&#8217;t admit as you say: &#8220;these less than rational notions&#8221; then he will say what ever he thinks the audience wants to hear?</p>
<p>Components of all religions are &#8220;less than rational&#8221; and yet we don&#8217;t force our candidates to admit as much. The fact that you would list a few of the Mormon ones and think that proves anything shows that you are not going to accept a Mormon, end of story. You must think Christian beliefs are completely rational.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Donald Wolberg		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2008/02/07/mitt-we-hardly-knew-ya/#comment-56558</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Wolberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 19:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2008/02/07/mitt-we-hardly-knew-ya/#comment-56558</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[To Mike M

Excellent and thoughtful comments. However, unfortunately I must be blameless regarding religious beliefs...I do like the Flat Earth school as well as the world sits on the back of that giant tortoise and it is tortoises all the way down. Mr. Romney&#039;s unusual beliefs are his own, as are anyone&#039;s and I cannot doubt his sincerity, or anyone&#039;s. My issues are of course, I am not a candidate for high (or low) office, and my non-religious views impact no public decisions. I do suggest that if indeed Mr. Romney holds that Missouri is the place to visit the Garden of Eden; that there were golden tablets that vanished but were interpreted by the angel Moroni, that Jesus appeared in the United States to preach and on and on, then there is a real issue about rationality, understanding the world and the significance of science in the 21st Century. If Mr. Romney does not believe these less than rational notions, he should have said so. But one suspects that in these matters, as in his poture vis a vis his new found conservatism post-Governor, Mr. Romney will say what ever he thinks the audience of the day wishes to hear. 

Mr. McCain strenght (and short-coming politically) is that he says exactly what he thinks and can be less than prudent. Indeed he has a temper, and he is a hero. Oh my, perhaps this is excactly what the political process needs. But Mr. McCain is genuine, and intellectually more honest than Mr. Romney. He will be a great candidate, and if matched against Mr. Obama, an exciting series of very pointed and shar debates may occur such as we have not seen in our lifetimes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Mike M</p>
<p>Excellent and thoughtful comments. However, unfortunately I must be blameless regarding religious beliefs&#8230;I do like the Flat Earth school as well as the world sits on the back of that giant tortoise and it is tortoises all the way down. Mr. Romney&#8217;s unusual beliefs are his own, as are anyone&#8217;s and I cannot doubt his sincerity, or anyone&#8217;s. My issues are of course, I am not a candidate for high (or low) office, and my non-religious views impact no public decisions. I do suggest that if indeed Mr. Romney holds that Missouri is the place to visit the Garden of Eden; that there were golden tablets that vanished but were interpreted by the angel Moroni, that Jesus appeared in the United States to preach and on and on, then there is a real issue about rationality, understanding the world and the significance of science in the 21st Century. If Mr. Romney does not believe these less than rational notions, he should have said so. But one suspects that in these matters, as in his poture vis a vis his new found conservatism post-Governor, Mr. Romney will say what ever he thinks the audience of the day wishes to hear. </p>
<p>Mr. McCain strenght (and short-coming politically) is that he says exactly what he thinks and can be less than prudent. Indeed he has a temper, and he is a hero. Oh my, perhaps this is excactly what the political process needs. But Mr. McCain is genuine, and intellectually more honest than Mr. Romney. He will be a great candidate, and if matched against Mr. Obama, an exciting series of very pointed and shar debates may occur such as we have not seen in our lifetimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: harry9000		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2008/02/07/mitt-we-hardly-knew-ya/#comment-56545</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[harry9000]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 18:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2008/02/07/mitt-we-hardly-knew-ya/#comment-56545</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Of course Xan doesn&#039;t concern himself with what happens to the Iraqi people once we abandon them to people who use women with Down&#039;s syndrome as weapons.  He throws up smoke screens and strawmen about what he thinks our motives for remaining in Iraq are but liberals and &quot;progressives&quot; of Xan&#039;s ilk studiously avoid broaching the subject of what happens next.  Thats because the impending slaughter would only be comfortably shrugged off by enlightened liberals as a product of the Bush legacy.  Not the direct cause of tolerant and caring liberals who were most afraid shoving democracy down the throats of Iraqis also equated with shoving courage and actual conviction down the liberals.

How long should this take Xan?  As long as it needs to.  I know slapping empty &quot;Free Tibet&quot; slogans on your bumper is as far as your convictions go, but they dont actually save anybody.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course Xan doesn&#8217;t concern himself with what happens to the Iraqi people once we abandon them to people who use women with Down&#8217;s syndrome as weapons.  He throws up smoke screens and strawmen about what he thinks our motives for remaining in Iraq are but liberals and &#8220;progressives&#8221; of Xan&#8217;s ilk studiously avoid broaching the subject of what happens next.  Thats because the impending slaughter would only be comfortably shrugged off by enlightened liberals as a product of the Bush legacy.  Not the direct cause of tolerant and caring liberals who were most afraid shoving democracy down the throats of Iraqis also equated with shoving courage and actual conviction down the liberals.</p>
<p>How long should this take Xan?  As long as it needs to.  I know slapping empty &#8220;Free Tibet&#8221; slogans on your bumper is as far as your convictions go, but they dont actually save anybody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom Grey - Liberty Dad		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2008/02/07/mitt-we-hardly-knew-ya/#comment-56540</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Grey - Liberty Dad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2008/02/07/mitt-we-hardly-knew-ya/#comment-56540</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m sorry about misuse of XHTML.  I think there might be a need for some &quot;/a&quot; somewhere that is not shown in the hint.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry about misuse of XHTML.  I think there might be a need for some &#8220;/a&#8221; somewhere that is not shown in the hint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Xanthippas		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2008/02/07/mitt-we-hardly-knew-ya/#comment-56538</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xanthippas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2008/02/07/mitt-we-hardly-knew-ya/#comment-56538</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Frankly in this time of war, I simply cannot let my campaign be a part of aiding a surrender to terror.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ah, the &quot;stabbed in the back&quot; meme arises yet again! (and I thought Romney was done campaigning...perhaps this is one thing he actually believes.) Of course this comment is linked to approvingly at this blog, which is not surprising given that the meme is mentioned prominently in about 2-3 posts a week at this blog alone.

You know, by so boldly opposing &quot;surrender&quot; Romney has allied himself against those who are likely to win the Presidency, their opposition to the war playing no small part in that victory. Of course, acknowledging that fact would undermine the idea it&#039;s a small minority of &quot;traitors&quot; and &quot;useful idiots&quot; who are undermining are great and glorious effort in the war, and so it is summarily dismissed. 

Here&#039;s the reality guys: the American people are about sick of this war because they don&#039;t see no end in sight. No one who is a proponent of this war can say what the conditions are for victory, or under what conditions our troops would be allowed to go home. The last several years of seemingly pointless war have raised the skepticism of the average American to enormous levels, and in response to their legitimate doubts proponents of the war say &quot;We&#039;re defeating al Qaeda...but we can&#039;t leave or al Qaeda will follow us here!&quot; or &quot;Yes, yes...the first four years of the war were completely botched, but we&#039;ve got the right strategy now!&quot; In response to questions about the politics of Iraq, there are only blank stares (as that subject has nothing to do with the military, and is completely without interest to most war proponents.) Yes, yes...things have gotten better...but only in the sense that they&#039;re as bad as they were in late 2003, or 2004 or 2005. Nobody seems to know what our goal is supposed to be besides somehow justifying staying in Iraq for a hundred years or so. 

And if you try to talk about the growing problem in Afghanistan and Pakistan...well, just throw some airstrikes at that too!

&lt;blockquote&gt;We must support McCain because the stakes of a Clinton or Obama presidency are too high.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Indeed! Except...the American people now favor Democrats on almost every issue, including the war on terror and national security. So, you have some work to do on that too.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Frankly in this time of war, I simply cannot let my campaign be a part of aiding a surrender to terror.</p></blockquote>
<p>Ah, the &#8220;stabbed in the back&#8221; meme arises yet again! (and I thought Romney was done campaigning&#8230;perhaps this is one thing he actually believes.) Of course this comment is linked to approvingly at this blog, which is not surprising given that the meme is mentioned prominently in about 2-3 posts a week at this blog alone.</p>
<p>You know, by so boldly opposing &#8220;surrender&#8221; Romney has allied himself against those who are likely to win the Presidency, their opposition to the war playing no small part in that victory. Of course, acknowledging that fact would undermine the idea it&#8217;s a small minority of &#8220;traitors&#8221; and &#8220;useful idiots&#8221; who are undermining are great and glorious effort in the war, and so it is summarily dismissed. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the reality guys: the American people are about sick of this war because they don&#8217;t see no end in sight. No one who is a proponent of this war can say what the conditions are for victory, or under what conditions our troops would be allowed to go home. The last several years of seemingly pointless war have raised the skepticism of the average American to enormous levels, and in response to their legitimate doubts proponents of the war say &#8220;We&#8217;re defeating al Qaeda&#8230;but we can&#8217;t leave or al Qaeda will follow us here!&#8221; or &#8220;Yes, yes&#8230;the first four years of the war were completely botched, but we&#8217;ve got the right strategy now!&#8221; In response to questions about the politics of Iraq, there are only blank stares (as that subject has nothing to do with the military, and is completely without interest to most war proponents.) Yes, yes&#8230;things have gotten better&#8230;but only in the sense that they&#8217;re as bad as they were in late 2003, or 2004 or 2005. Nobody seems to know what our goal is supposed to be besides somehow justifying staying in Iraq for a hundred years or so. </p>
<p>And if you try to talk about the growing problem in Afghanistan and Pakistan&#8230;well, just throw some airstrikes at that too!</p>
<blockquote><p>We must support McCain because the stakes of a Clinton or Obama presidency are too high.</p></blockquote>
<p>Indeed! Except&#8230;the American people now favor Democrats on almost every issue, including the war on terror and national security. So, you have some work to do on that too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike M		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2008/02/07/mitt-we-hardly-knew-ya/#comment-56525</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2008/02/07/mitt-we-hardly-knew-ya/#comment-56525</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Donald Wolberg,

Did you even try to learn more about Romney? He said he changed his opinion on abortion, end of story. He&#039;s a very religious guy-do you doubt that? Given that he is a very religious guy, where do you think he has ALWAYS been on the abortion issue? Yes he said while running for Governor that &quot;he would do nothing to interfere with a women&#039;s right to choose.&quot; It wasn&#039;t an important issue for him as Governor of Mass. He did other things.

You guys keep saying the same things about Mitt, with no appreciation of his explanations. Very superficial analysis. Great comments about Mormonism also. Really good. Every religion has it&#039;s strange components. Mitt has lived his life, governed, lead a business, without his beliefs coming into play. Are you a religious person Donald? You don&#039;t think your faith sounds strange to people who don&#039;t believe.

McCain&#039;s push on Amnesty is strikes 1-3 against him. Six months ago he and others said we had to give these people amnesty because they we couldn&#039;t deport them all. Turns out if you enforce the laws in the workplace, they won&#039;t have work and they will go home. Gee, that was tough. Brilliant guy your man. Don&#039;t even have to start on McCain-Feingold, Keating 5, etc.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donald Wolberg,</p>
<p>Did you even try to learn more about Romney? He said he changed his opinion on abortion, end of story. He&#8217;s a very religious guy-do you doubt that? Given that he is a very religious guy, where do you think he has ALWAYS been on the abortion issue? Yes he said while running for Governor that &#8220;he would do nothing to interfere with a women&#8217;s right to choose.&#8221; It wasn&#8217;t an important issue for him as Governor of Mass. He did other things.</p>
<p>You guys keep saying the same things about Mitt, with no appreciation of his explanations. Very superficial analysis. Great comments about Mormonism also. Really good. Every religion has it&#8217;s strange components. Mitt has lived his life, governed, lead a business, without his beliefs coming into play. Are you a religious person Donald? You don&#8217;t think your faith sounds strange to people who don&#8217;t believe.</p>
<p>McCain&#8217;s push on Amnesty is strikes 1-3 against him. Six months ago he and others said we had to give these people amnesty because they we couldn&#8217;t deport them all. Turns out if you enforce the laws in the workplace, they won&#8217;t have work and they will go home. Gee, that was tough. Brilliant guy your man. Don&#8217;t even have to start on McCain-Feingold, Keating 5, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom Grey - Liberty Dad		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2008/02/07/mitt-we-hardly-knew-ya/#comment-56521</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Grey - Liberty Dad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2008/02/07/mitt-we-hardly-knew-ya/#comment-56521</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Neo, please consider looking at Joe Carter of the Evangelical Outpost. (A big Huckabee fan)
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.evangelicaloutpost.com/archives/004216.html&quot; title=&quot;Voter based reality&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;

It reviews, excellently, the post Super Tuesday results. 

It also links to a fine anti-Romney list, especially the Romney&#039;s Bain takeover of a company that was then lent money to expand, a LOT (with lots of fees for Bain), which then went belly up.  NOT impressive (except for Bain collecting fees). (Some comments there pro-Romney)

Joe doesn&#039;t think McCain will offer Huckabee the VP spot -- and doesn&#039;t think Huck should accept if offered.

I doubly disagree.  But the unspoken continuation of the &quot;fight&quot; for the Reps will probably be for McCain to decide to accept Huck as VP or not -- and for Huck to decide to accept or not.  

Huck haters will probably be pushing Thompson or some other Southerner.

You correctly picked up on only 1 of the 7 reasons to support Reps, Victory.  The other 6 -- are the US SC Justices over 68.  

Until Roe is overturned, and abortion returned to the states, the pro-life folk (about a third or more Rep voters, often Single-Issue) will continue to have it high on the agenda.  The gay marriage stuff is mostly an abortion fight substitute, against Courts jamming &#039;legislation&#039; in the form of &#039;penumbras of unenumerated rights&#039; down on unwilling voters.  Elitist judges.

#3 Ron Paul -- has long been the MOST conservative, MOST principled, and MOST honest politician in Washington.  But his anti-War (war is the health of the state) non-intervention (free trade NOT isolationism) is no longer for me (free trade, yes).  The USA, and the world, need a Free and Democratic Iraq.

I continue to pray for:
A World Without Dictators.&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neo, please consider looking at Joe Carter of the Evangelical Outpost. (A big Huckabee fan)<br />
<a href="http://www.evangelicaloutpost.com/archives/004216.html" title="Voter based reality" rel="nofollow"></p>
<p>It reviews, excellently, the post Super Tuesday results. </p>
<p>It also links to a fine anti-Romney list, especially the Romney&#8217;s Bain takeover of a company that was then lent money to expand, a LOT (with lots of fees for Bain), which then went belly up.  NOT impressive (except for Bain collecting fees). (Some comments there pro-Romney)</p>
<p>Joe doesn&#8217;t think McCain will offer Huckabee the VP spot &#8212; and doesn&#8217;t think Huck should accept if offered.</p>
<p>I doubly disagree.  But the unspoken continuation of the &#8220;fight&#8221; for the Reps will probably be for McCain to decide to accept Huck as VP or not &#8212; and for Huck to decide to accept or not.  </p>
<p>Huck haters will probably be pushing Thompson or some other Southerner.</p>
<p>You correctly picked up on only 1 of the 7 reasons to support Reps, Victory.  The other 6 &#8212; are the US SC Justices over 68.  </p>
<p>Until Roe is overturned, and abortion returned to the states, the pro-life folk (about a third or more Rep voters, often Single-Issue) will continue to have it high on the agenda.  The gay marriage stuff is mostly an abortion fight substitute, against Courts jamming &#8216;legislation&#8217; in the form of &#8216;penumbras of unenumerated rights&#8217; down on unwilling voters.  Elitist judges.</p>
<p>#3 Ron Paul &#8212; has long been the MOST conservative, MOST principled, and MOST honest politician in Washington.  But his anti-War (war is the health of the state) non-intervention (free trade NOT isolationism) is no longer for me (free trade, yes).  The USA, and the world, need a Free and Democratic Iraq.</p>
<p>I continue to pray for:<br />
A World Without Dictators.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Donald Wolberg		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2008/02/07/mitt-we-hardly-knew-ya/#comment-56508</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Wolberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 14:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2008/02/07/mitt-we-hardly-knew-ya/#comment-56508</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[One wonders at the &quot;bend-over&quot; attitude toward Romney--conservatives will tolerate anything from any candidate who mouths some words today, but spewed nonsense yesyerday. If Romney&#039;s liberalism was excusable when he was a governor (just to get elected in a liberal state), why is he any more genuine today, spewing superficially held  &quot;conservative&quot; ideals while he was trying to become a Presidential candidate. One comes back to the marvelous remarks of the late Grouch Marx, &quot;These are my principles. If you don&#039;t like them, I have others.&quot;

Mr. McCain is as he is: rough hewn, &quot;old as dirt and with more scars than Frankenstein,&quot; as he himself said, but a real human being, less polished or tailored than Romney, but real. Mr. Romney has spent a life of feathering his financial nest, less than aggressively serving the nation, and certainly not encouraging his sons to serve (contrast this with Mr. McCain and his sons). Similarly, it would have been a delightful political season with Mr. Romney answering embarassing questions from the press: &quot;Mr. Romney, we live in an age of great scientific accomplishment. Do you really believe the Garden of Eden in in Missouri, or that the American Indian tribes are really the Lost tribes of Israel.&quot;  This is the election of 2008 confronting us, not 1848, and the world is a bit more sophisticated.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One wonders at the &#8220;bend-over&#8221; attitude toward Romney&#8211;conservatives will tolerate anything from any candidate who mouths some words today, but spewed nonsense yesyerday. If Romney&#8217;s liberalism was excusable when he was a governor (just to get elected in a liberal state), why is he any more genuine today, spewing superficially held  &#8220;conservative&#8221; ideals while he was trying to become a Presidential candidate. One comes back to the marvelous remarks of the late Grouch Marx, &#8220;These are my principles. If you don&#8217;t like them, I have others.&#8221;</p>
<p>Mr. McCain is as he is: rough hewn, &#8220;old as dirt and with more scars than Frankenstein,&#8221; as he himself said, but a real human being, less polished or tailored than Romney, but real. Mr. Romney has spent a life of feathering his financial nest, less than aggressively serving the nation, and certainly not encouraging his sons to serve (contrast this with Mr. McCain and his sons). Similarly, it would have been a delightful political season with Mr. Romney answering embarassing questions from the press: &#8220;Mr. Romney, we live in an age of great scientific accomplishment. Do you really believe the Garden of Eden in in Missouri, or that the American Indian tribes are really the Lost tribes of Israel.&#8221;  This is the election of 2008 confronting us, not 1848, and the world is a bit more sophisticated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
