Comments on: Fighting the wrong war

By: Tatterdemalian

Tatterdemalian — Sun, 03 Dec 2006 20:45:16 +0000

We will eventually have to make war on the entire Middle East. Those artificial, colonially-imposed national borders are incredibly useful when the supporters of Arab dictators want to declare “hey, you souldn’t have fought that artificial nation, this other one was more dangerous all along!” aren’t they?

Of course, if we had gone to war with anyone BUT Iraq after Afghanistan, the left’s song and dance would have been, “But Saddam has WMDs, and threw out the UN inspectors and threatened to kill them if they ever returned! It was a stupid mistake to invade Iran / Pakistan / North Korea / Sudan / anywhere else!”

I wonder if anyone makes t-shirts or bumper stickers that read “I’d rather make war on terror, than war on the weather.”

By: Steve

Steve — Sat, 02 Dec 2006 00:45:22 +0000

LOL! Afghanistan=Syria.

By: Steve

Steve — Sat, 02 Dec 2006 00:44:47 +0000

The number one problem with this analysis is that the WMD intelligence failure is not totally in the past: it’s a reasonable benchmark about the credibility and competence of this administration, and the architects of this war.

In short, they screwed up the intelligence, and they screwed up the post-war: who’s going to trust them now? Of course, the same applies to all the “cakewalk” drummers from before the war as well.

Fighting the wrong war? Again? First it was Afghanistan, which was a no brainer. Then it was Iraq, well, many people had reservations about that. Now we are being told, it’s neither of those two, it’s Iraq: so let’s go to war against them.

I am resigned to how things will shake out, but, we have spent a huge amount of money and taken a significant (for our puny forces) number of casualties, and before you go on any more excellent adventures, it might be a good idea to wrap things up in Iraq and Syria, first.