<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: By their works shall ye know them: barbarians and sadists	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2006/06/20/by-their-works-shall-ye-know-them/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2006/06/20/by-their-works-shall-ye-know-them/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 04:11:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Thatguy		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2006/06/20/by-their-works-shall-ye-know-them/#comment-17435</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thatguy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jun 2006 21:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2006/06/by-their-works-shall-ye-know-them.html#comment-17435</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Confud says 5:31 PM, July 05, 2006,&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&quot;Here is but one. There are many more, official and not. Not too many in your rightwing bubbleworld I guess.&quot;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;LOL, there&#039;s no bubble here, only the facts. And the fact is much of this can be explained by the simple fact that there&#039;s an insurgency going on by your friends in Al-Qaida and Co. It&#039;s kinda hard to rebuild a country when aid workers are being killed, kidnapped, and beheaded on Snuff...Al-Jazeera TV. I guess you missed that point in your lefty blogs, or in my last point but I&#039;ll be happy to point it out again. And again. And again. lol. Hey...still waiting for your proof.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&quot;It is telling that you would blithely discard a report from the COE as a &quot;whacko publication&quot;. Who should we refer to for data then smartboy?&quot;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;I believe it was a different &#039;publication&#039; I was dissing. Oh yeah, that Zmag thing you were peddling. LOL, what a joke. Just another of your wacko lefty sites inventing new atrocities committed by big bad Americans. I love how your link quotes people claiming American snipers were shooting at them. It offers no context like perhaps they were shooting at the Americans first? LOL. And no attempts were made by the writers, it seems, to gain the American point of view. What are they too lazy to do some homework? lol&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Oh but maybe you ought to read some more about the liberation of Naples by the Allies in WWII when you&#039;re not immersed in hate-America fiction. Not a smooth operation there either and they had a huge army at their disposal without the threat of insurgent attacks to deal with. Just kleptomaniacal mafioso. Sorta like your friend Saddam with the UNICEF supplies. lol&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;As for reliable sources, try reading mine. Our side doesn&#039;t have a history of inventing atrocities or exaggerating the negative (CBS memogate anyone?). They may accentuate the positive, but that&#039;s not the same as lying now is it? Don&#039;t be scared. lol. &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&quot;Malkin and her band of rabid racist cheerleaders for death?&quot;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Malkin racist? Lol that&#039;s the most asinine thing you&#039;ve said yet. Her hate mail is filled with racist rants from your troll brethren. The only death cheerleaders comes from your camp when they slay Iraqi journalists who&#039;s tortured, (the real kind, not the imagined kind at Club Gitmo) stripped, and ultimately killed in public by having her throat slit. Nice going...&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Malkin and the conservative blogosphere are actually performing a service by highlighting the hateful, insane, racist behavior of the left in supporting and promoting terrorism worldwide.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Confud says 5:31 PM, July 05, 2006,</p>
<p>&#8220;Here is but one. There are many more, official and not. Not too many in your rightwing bubbleworld I guess.&#8221;</p>
<p>LOL, there&#8217;s no bubble here, only the facts. And the fact is much of this can be explained by the simple fact that there&#8217;s an insurgency going on by your friends in Al-Qaida and Co. It&#8217;s kinda hard to rebuild a country when aid workers are being killed, kidnapped, and beheaded on Snuff&#8230;Al-Jazeera TV. I guess you missed that point in your lefty blogs, or in my last point but I&#8217;ll be happy to point it out again. And again. And again. lol. Hey&#8230;still waiting for your proof.</p>
<p>&#8220;It is telling that you would blithely discard a report from the COE as a &#8220;whacko publication&#8221;. Who should we refer to for data then smartboy?&#8221;</p>
<p>I believe it was a different &#8216;publication&#8217; I was dissing. Oh yeah, that Zmag thing you were peddling. LOL, what a joke. Just another of your wacko lefty sites inventing new atrocities committed by big bad Americans. I love how your link quotes people claiming American snipers were shooting at them. It offers no context like perhaps they were shooting at the Americans first? LOL. And no attempts were made by the writers, it seems, to gain the American point of view. What are they too lazy to do some homework? lol</p>
<p>Oh but maybe you ought to read some more about the liberation of Naples by the Allies in WWII when you&#8217;re not immersed in hate-America fiction. Not a smooth operation there either and they had a huge army at their disposal without the threat of insurgent attacks to deal with. Just kleptomaniacal mafioso. Sorta like your friend Saddam with the UNICEF supplies. lol</p>
<p>As for reliable sources, try reading mine. Our side doesn&#8217;t have a history of inventing atrocities or exaggerating the negative (CBS memogate anyone?). They may accentuate the positive, but that&#8217;s not the same as lying now is it? Don&#8217;t be scared. lol. </p>
<p>&#8220;Malkin and her band of rabid racist cheerleaders for death?&#8221;</p>
<p>Malkin racist? Lol that&#8217;s the most asinine thing you&#8217;ve said yet. Her hate mail is filled with racist rants from your troll brethren. The only death cheerleaders comes from your camp when they slay Iraqi journalists who&#8217;s tortured, (the real kind, not the imagined kind at Club Gitmo) stripped, and ultimately killed in public by having her throat slit. Nice going&#8230;</p>
<p>Malkin and the conservative blogosphere are actually performing a service by highlighting the hateful, insane, racist behavior of the left in supporting and promoting terrorism worldwide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Thatguy		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2006/06/20/by-their-works-shall-ye-know-them/#comment-17436</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thatguy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jun 2006 21:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2006/06/by-their-works-shall-ye-know-them.html#comment-17436</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Confud says on  4:51 PM, July 05, 2006&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&quot;BTW the Iraqi Baathists and the Syrian Baathists haven&#039;t been pals for 40 odd years. You need to read up before pontificating.&quot;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Oh sure, they&#039;ve only belonged to the same idealogy, based on your Nazi -Socialist buddies, for the last 40 years but that means nothing of course. lol. Assad and Saddam may not have been pals but neither is Bush and Chirac but they manage to work together occassionally. &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&quot;There are hundreds of thousands of Iraqi refugees in Syria alone.&quot;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Where was the token outrage from you folks when millions were refugees under Saddam? hmmm? And many are probably former Baathists looking for a new home. Good riddance. Hardly a sympathetic groups of victims are they?&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&quot;If you&#039;d rather let them starve because they might one day oppose US occupation, then I suggest that that is reason enough for them to hate you and your kind with a passion.&quot;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Who said anything about starving? You kookamungas really do exaggerate. Where&#039;s the proof that the US is behind a starvation policy. Hmmm?&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&quot;It takes a particularly twisted mind to wish to punish refugees on the basis of what a few may do in the future. You&#039;re a sick little boy.&quot;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Nah, that&#039;s something you folks on the left specialize in, what with your &#039;re-education camps&#039; and boat people. We don&#039;t try to punish anybody but the guilty. The Sunnis are punishing themselves by supporting a terrorist insurgency that&#039;s sinking they&#039;re only hopes of retaining some of their old power. Anyhow who&#039;s sick here? We who seek democracy and a stable ally in the Arab world or appeasers like you who support tyrants who gas their own people? Hmmm? &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;The left embraces every known terrorist and ignores genuine moves towards freedom and prosperity. Korea, Vietnam, Europe all prove the feeble intellectual seriousness of you folks. That&#039;s why yours is a dustbin idealogy. Happy down there? lol]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Confud says on  4:51 PM, July 05, 2006</p>
<p>&#8220;BTW the Iraqi Baathists and the Syrian Baathists haven&#8217;t been pals for 40 odd years. You need to read up before pontificating.&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh sure, they&#8217;ve only belonged to the same idealogy, based on your Nazi -Socialist buddies, for the last 40 years but that means nothing of course. lol. Assad and Saddam may not have been pals but neither is Bush and Chirac but they manage to work together occassionally. </p>
<p>&#8220;There are hundreds of thousands of Iraqi refugees in Syria alone.&#8221;</p>
<p>Where was the token outrage from you folks when millions were refugees under Saddam? hmmm? And many are probably former Baathists looking for a new home. Good riddance. Hardly a sympathetic groups of victims are they?</p>
<p>&#8220;If you&#8217;d rather let them starve because they might one day oppose US occupation, then I suggest that that is reason enough for them to hate you and your kind with a passion.&#8221;</p>
<p>Who said anything about starving? You kookamungas really do exaggerate. Where&#8217;s the proof that the US is behind a starvation policy. Hmmm?</p>
<p>&#8220;It takes a particularly twisted mind to wish to punish refugees on the basis of what a few may do in the future. You&#8217;re a sick little boy.&#8221;</p>
<p>Nah, that&#8217;s something you folks on the left specialize in, what with your &#8216;re-education camps&#8217; and boat people. We don&#8217;t try to punish anybody but the guilty. The Sunnis are punishing themselves by supporting a terrorist insurgency that&#8217;s sinking they&#8217;re only hopes of retaining some of their old power. Anyhow who&#8217;s sick here? We who seek democracy and a stable ally in the Arab world or appeasers like you who support tyrants who gas their own people? Hmmm? </p>
<p>The left embraces every known terrorist and ignores genuine moves towards freedom and prosperity. Korea, Vietnam, Europe all prove the feeble intellectual seriousness of you folks. That&#8217;s why yours is a dustbin idealogy. Happy down there? lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Thatguy		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2006/06/20/by-their-works-shall-ye-know-them/#comment-17437</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thatguy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jun 2006 21:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2006/06/by-their-works-shall-ye-know-them.html#comment-17437</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Confud says on 4:37 PM, July 05, 2006&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&quot;Just a teensy weensy billion dollars eh?&quot;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Money well spent compared to the alternative eh? I bet you folks think the billions in the Marshall Plan were all efficiently allocated as well. lol&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&quot;You&#039;re the archetypical neocon idiot.&quot;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Nah, there&#039;s nothing idiotic in the verbal smackdown I&#039;m delivering to you bub. You represent the perfect appeasenik idiot. Ignorant of the facts, historical context and in love with self hatred. How&#039;s that going for you?&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&quot;The more you invent my thoughts, heros etc the weaker your argument sounds.&quot;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Nah, I&#039;m only working with what you give me son. You need to make your &lt;BR/&gt;blistering bigotry more clear for us if you feel misunderstood. LOL!&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&quot;At the base, it is all supposition anyway. You refute documented facts and offer none in return.&quot;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Documented facts, you mean the leftists publications you consider gospel? lol What about my links detailing the reconstruction efforts? Still too scared to read that dread Muslim Zionist Amir Taheri or the Zarqawi letter? Here I am offering plenty of facts which you feign such interest in and you claim they don&#039;t exist. How sad and typical.&lt;BR/&gt;Here they are again when you have the moral courage to read them. &lt;BR/&gt;I knew you couldn&#039;t argue and running from my links only strengthens my point. Thx for letting us all know. lol&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;http://www.commentarymagazine.com/article.asp?aid=12106023_1&lt;BR/&gt;http://www.nationalreview.com/document/zarkawi200402121818.asp&lt;BR/&gt;http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/iraq/2004/02/040212-al-zarqawi.htm&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Oh and here&#039;s some more opinions you&#039;ll love. Try and read it before you blather okay kiddo? It looks bad for you. lol&lt;BR/&gt;http://www.conservative.org/pressroom/2006/060628iraq.pdf&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Most of what I refute was fiction not fact. And your statement actually describes you-except for the refute part. You can replace that word with another like hide, ignore, flee, cower behind the skirt of terror. lol&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&quot;Attacking hospitals is a war crime, and there is no credible evidence that they have been used by fighters at any time as a firing position.&quot;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Riigght. So all the credible reports of Islamists using Red Crescent ambulances as personnel carriers was all invention too? Since when did you care about war crimes when your side appeases every one committed by your friends in Al-Qaida? Hospitals can be rebuilt, and allowing them to be used as sanctuaries for terrorists would be a greater crime. Just ask the folks in Fallujah, Ramadi, Samarra, Baghdad...&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&quot;Look it up between your lols you nonce.&quot;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;LOL, so embittered and incoherent you couldn&#039;t spell dunce properly? Or was nonce your intent? I guess it&#039;s a word in that fantasy world you live in. lol&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&quot;I really did lol at your Castro reference. You wingnuts will believe anything won&#039;t you?&quot;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;You like being proven wrong? You&#039;re welcome. lol. Deep down I think it you know it to be true, which is why you&#039;ve offered no proof to doubt Forbes&#039;s analysis of Castro&#039;s fortune. Forbes magazine is certainly more credible than some of the wacko sources you&#039;ve linked here. LOL]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Confud says on 4:37 PM, July 05, 2006</p>
<p>&#8220;Just a teensy weensy billion dollars eh?&#8221;</p>
<p>Money well spent compared to the alternative eh? I bet you folks think the billions in the Marshall Plan were all efficiently allocated as well. lol</p>
<p>&#8220;You&#8217;re the archetypical neocon idiot.&#8221;</p>
<p>Nah, there&#8217;s nothing idiotic in the verbal smackdown I&#8217;m delivering to you bub. You represent the perfect appeasenik idiot. Ignorant of the facts, historical context and in love with self hatred. How&#8217;s that going for you?</p>
<p>&#8220;The more you invent my thoughts, heros etc the weaker your argument sounds.&#8221;</p>
<p>Nah, I&#8217;m only working with what you give me son. You need to make your <br />blistering bigotry more clear for us if you feel misunderstood. LOL!</p>
<p>&#8220;At the base, it is all supposition anyway. You refute documented facts and offer none in return.&#8221;</p>
<p>Documented facts, you mean the leftists publications you consider gospel? lol What about my links detailing the reconstruction efforts? Still too scared to read that dread Muslim Zionist Amir Taheri or the Zarqawi letter? Here I am offering plenty of facts which you feign such interest in and you claim they don&#8217;t exist. How sad and typical.<br />Here they are again when you have the moral courage to read them. <br />I knew you couldn&#8217;t argue and running from my links only strengthens my point. Thx for letting us all know. lol</p>
<p><a href="http://www.commentarymagazine.com/article.asp?aid=12106023_1" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.commentarymagazine.com/article.asp?aid=12106023_1</a><br /><a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/document/zarkawi200402121818.asp" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.nationalreview.com/document/zarkawi200402121818.asp</a><br /><a href="http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/iraq/2004/02/040212-al-zarqawi.htm" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/iraq/2004/02/040212-al-zarqawi.htm</a></p>
<p>Oh and here&#8217;s some more opinions you&#8217;ll love. Try and read it before you blather okay kiddo? It looks bad for you. lol<br /><a href="http://www.conservative.org/pressroom/2006/060628iraq.pdf" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.conservative.org/pressroom/2006/060628iraq.pdf</a></p>
<p>Most of what I refute was fiction not fact. And your statement actually describes you-except for the refute part. You can replace that word with another like hide, ignore, flee, cower behind the skirt of terror. lol</p>
<p>&#8220;Attacking hospitals is a war crime, and there is no credible evidence that they have been used by fighters at any time as a firing position.&#8221;</p>
<p>Riigght. So all the credible reports of Islamists using Red Crescent ambulances as personnel carriers was all invention too? Since when did you care about war crimes when your side appeases every one committed by your friends in Al-Qaida? Hospitals can be rebuilt, and allowing them to be used as sanctuaries for terrorists would be a greater crime. Just ask the folks in Fallujah, Ramadi, Samarra, Baghdad&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Look it up between your lols you nonce.&#8221;</p>
<p>LOL, so embittered and incoherent you couldn&#8217;t spell dunce properly? Or was nonce your intent? I guess it&#8217;s a word in that fantasy world you live in. lol</p>
<p>&#8220;I really did lol at your Castro reference. You wingnuts will believe anything won&#8217;t you?&#8221;</p>
<p>You like being proven wrong? You&#8217;re welcome. lol. Deep down I think it you know it to be true, which is why you&#8217;ve offered no proof to doubt Forbes&#8217;s analysis of Castro&#8217;s fortune. Forbes magazine is certainly more credible than some of the wacko sources you&#8217;ve linked here. LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: confusedforeigner		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2006/06/20/by-their-works-shall-ye-know-them/#comment-17438</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[confusedforeigner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jun 2006 21:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2006/06/by-their-works-shall-ye-know-them.html#comment-17438</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;&lt;BR/&gt;I love it when you throw crap like that out without offering any proof to back it up. Still waiting... &quot;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Here is but one. There are many more, official and not. Not too many in your rightwing bubbleworld I guess.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;http://www.brusselstribunal.org/DahrReport.htm&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;It is telling that you would blithely discard a report from the COE as a &quot;whacko publication&quot;. Who should we refer to for data then smartboy? &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Malkin and her band of rabid racist cheerleaders for death?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<br />I love it when you throw crap like that out without offering any proof to back it up. Still waiting&#8230; &#8220;</p>
<p>Here is but one. There are many more, official and not. Not too many in your rightwing bubbleworld I guess.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.brusselstribunal.org/DahrReport.htm" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.brusselstribunal.org/DahrReport.htm</a></p>
<p>It is telling that you would blithely discard a report from the COE as a &#8220;whacko publication&#8221;. Who should we refer to for data then smartboy? </p>
<p>Malkin and her band of rabid racist cheerleaders for death?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: confusedforeigner		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2006/06/20/by-their-works-shall-ye-know-them/#comment-17439</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[confusedforeigner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jun 2006 21:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2006/06/by-their-works-shall-ye-know-them.html#comment-17439</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[BTW the Iraqi Baathists and the Syrian Baathists haven&#039;t been pals for 40 odd years. You need to read up before pontificating.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;There are hundreds of thousands of Iraqi refugees in Syria alone. If you&#039;d rather let them starve because they might one day oppose US occupation, then I suggest that that is reason enough for them to hate you and your kind with a passion.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;It takes a particularly twisted mind to wish to punish refugees on the basis of what a few may do in the future. You&#039;re a sick little boy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW the Iraqi Baathists and the Syrian Baathists haven&#8217;t been pals for 40 odd years. You need to read up before pontificating.</p>
<p>There are hundreds of thousands of Iraqi refugees in Syria alone. If you&#8217;d rather let them starve because they might one day oppose US occupation, then I suggest that that is reason enough for them to hate you and your kind with a passion.</p>
<p>It takes a particularly twisted mind to wish to punish refugees on the basis of what a few may do in the future. You&#8217;re a sick little boy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: confusedforeigner		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2006/06/20/by-their-works-shall-ye-know-them/#comment-17440</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[confusedforeigner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jun 2006 21:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2006/06/by-their-works-shall-ye-know-them.html#comment-17440</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Just a teensy weensy billion dollars eh? &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;You&#039;re the archetypical neocon idiot. The more you invent my thoughts, heros etc the weaker your argument sounds. At the base, it is all supposition anyway. You refute documented facts and offer none in return.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Attacking hospitals is a war crime, and there is no credible evidence that they have been used by fighters at any time as a firing position. &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Look it up between your lols you nonce.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;I really did lol at your Castro reference. You wingnuts will believe anything won&#039;t you?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a teensy weensy billion dollars eh? </p>
<p>You&#8217;re the archetypical neocon idiot. The more you invent my thoughts, heros etc the weaker your argument sounds. At the base, it is all supposition anyway. You refute documented facts and offer none in return.</p>
<p>Attacking hospitals is a war crime, and there is no credible evidence that they have been used by fighters at any time as a firing position. </p>
<p>Look it up between your lols you nonce.</p>
<p>I really did lol at your Castro reference. You wingnuts will believe anything won&#8217;t you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Thatguy		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2006/06/20/by-their-works-shall-ye-know-them/#comment-17441</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thatguy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jun 2006 21:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2006/06/by-their-works-shall-ye-know-them.html#comment-17441</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Confud says on 2:48 AM, June 27, 2006&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&quot;Oh and BTW, Halliburton was given US$1 billion to rebuild Iraqs hospitals.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;So far, nothing has happened and several hospitals have been destroyed by US troops. Nice one Dick.&quot;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;I love it when you throw crap like that out without offering any proof to back it up. Still waiting...  &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Maybe nothing has happened (which is unlikely given how poorly it would reflect on the company thereby harming their public image and losing future contracts). Could it be because of something called the insurgency? Hmmm? We know they sabotage oil refineries, pipelines, attack doctors and destroy clinics, assassinate opposition leaders-all in the name of Allah. And all the things you enjoy hearing about.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Now lets ask a hypothetical question. Why would troops (of any flag) &#039;destroy&#039; hospitals? Could it be insurgents were inside firing on them? Should we treat hospitals and mosques as safe zones where terrorists can fire on our guys at will? What if they want to shoot women and kids? How bout old timers like you? Would that be okay? Well maybe if they shot just you heh? lol]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Confud says on 2:48 AM, June 27, 2006</p>
<p>&#8220;Oh and BTW, Halliburton was given US$1 billion to rebuild Iraqs hospitals.</p>
<p>So far, nothing has happened and several hospitals have been destroyed by US troops. Nice one Dick.&#8221;</p>
<p>I love it when you throw crap like that out without offering any proof to back it up. Still waiting&#8230;  </p>
<p>Maybe nothing has happened (which is unlikely given how poorly it would reflect on the company thereby harming their public image and losing future contracts). Could it be because of something called the insurgency? Hmmm? We know they sabotage oil refineries, pipelines, attack doctors and destroy clinics, assassinate opposition leaders-all in the name of Allah. And all the things you enjoy hearing about.</p>
<p>Now lets ask a hypothetical question. Why would troops (of any flag) &#8216;destroy&#8217; hospitals? Could it be insurgents were inside firing on them? Should we treat hospitals and mosques as safe zones where terrorists can fire on our guys at will? What if they want to shoot women and kids? How bout old timers like you? Would that be okay? Well maybe if they shot just you heh? lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Thatguy		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2006/06/20/by-their-works-shall-ye-know-them/#comment-17442</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thatguy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jun 2006 21:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2006/06/by-their-works-shall-ye-know-them.html#comment-17442</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Confud says on  2:45 AM, June 27, 2006&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&quot;You&#039;re living in a smug little fantasy land you twit. And get this, the US is actively stopping aid getting to refugees in Syria. What great guys. Compassionate conservativism. What a sick joke&quot;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Am I? Or am I just able to penetrate that fog you live in with cold hard facts and logic that dismay you. It seems you&#039;re the only one making a twit of his fantasy self here. You shamefully ignored and fled from my points to post another biased and unreliable article from a wacko publication. LOL I at least offered genuine rebuttals and argument when you can only descend into terrified name calling...pathetic.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;As for the report about Syrian refugees, you basically rehashed one of your earlier links didn&#039;t ya? lol. Ah but the writer conveniently ignores whether these newly arrived refugees are Sunnis. Since Syria is a Baathist state, therefore an idealogical brother of Hussein&#039;s Sunni dictatorship, it&#039;s likely these folks are former Baathists. It still doesn&#039;t disprove my point that the number of Iraqi refugees across the Middle East have largely declined substantially since the war ended. &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;And what makes you so sure we stopped giving aid? Or are we just restricting aid from being used by potential terrorists? Is it so hard to think a place like the one described might be a breeding ground for future terrorists the way the ones in Jordan and the West Bank are? Syria, after all, is a transit point for your heroes in the &#039;insurgency&#039;. lol&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&quot;Are you suggesting that Palstinian refugees aren&#039;t worth considering or counting? It wouldn&#039;t surprise me if you were given the rabid antiPalestinian nature of most of the regulars here.&quot;&quot;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;What I&#039;m saying is that they aren&#039;t native Iraqis are they? When I spoke of millions of refugees returning home was I referring to Palestianian Arabs? Hmmmm? As for being anti-Palestinian...what simplistic crockitude, folks here simply don&#039;t support terrorism. Whether it&#039;s Hamas, Fatah, Al-Qaida, or Timothy McVeigh (you&#039;ve got posters of them all, don&#039;t ya kiddo?). I&#039;m sure we&#039;d all support a Palestinian state in the West Bank if we were gauranteed that they&#039;d be free of terrorists like that pig Arafat. If Hamas would recognize Israel&#039;s right to exist that might mean something but until your friends get their act together it&#039;s going to be a hard road for mass-murdering Islamists over there. Not to hard to see eh?&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&quot;And personally, I find it repulsive that companies associated with the ruling clique are making huge amounts of money out of war. If you can&#039;t see the danger of those sorts of cosy arrangements then you don&#039;t have much respect for democracy as a principle rather than just a meaningless slogan.&quot;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;The &#039;ruling clique&#039; as you simplistically label them seem to be having quite a lot of difficulty passing key points of their agenda aren&#039;t they? Social security reform was killed along with repeals to the death tax so don&#039;t be so sure they rule much of anything. As for making money, what are you so offended by? You&#039;re third world heroes like Castro are worth hundreds of millions.&lt;BR/&gt;http://articles.news.aol.com/business/_a/castro-is-worth-900-million-report-says/20060505092609990013&lt;BR/&gt;Granted it&#039;s not from war but through the enslavement of his people. I bet it&#039;s a model you would love to emulate, hey governor? lol&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;As for Halliburton-good for them. This witch hunt against a corporation is the sort of activity often carried out by folks who don&#039;t understand and fear capitalism and economics. As long as Cheney did nothing to aid his former employer from gaining contracts, where&#039;s the scandal? Given that it&#039;s probably the most scrutinized company in America it would be very hard for them to accomplish fraud undetected so again, where&#039;s the scandal? Nice try&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Here&#039;s something about your favorite company:&lt;BR/&gt;http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2003/12/29/165459.shtml&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;This snippet might interest you:&lt;BR/&gt;&#039;So far this year, Halliburton&#039;s profits from Iraq have been minimal,&quot; the Times admitted. &quot;The company&#039;s latest report to the Securities and Exchange Commission shows $1.3 billion in revenues from work in Iraq and $46 million in pretax profits for the first nine months of 2003.&#039;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Not the sort profit margin common among war profiteers is it?&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&quot;Your sneering style is annoyingly Sally-like.&quot;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;LOL, you&#039;re the one to criticize annoying aren&#039;t you? LMAO!!!&lt;BR/&gt;And good for Sally. Face it chuckles, you&#039;re not the victim here. I can argue straight when the other party does. I&#039;m waiting....lol]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Confud says on  2:45 AM, June 27, 2006</p>
<p>&#8220;You&#8217;re living in a smug little fantasy land you twit. And get this, the US is actively stopping aid getting to refugees in Syria. What great guys. Compassionate conservativism. What a sick joke&#8221;</p>
<p>Am I? Or am I just able to penetrate that fog you live in with cold hard facts and logic that dismay you. It seems you&#8217;re the only one making a twit of his fantasy self here. You shamefully ignored and fled from my points to post another biased and unreliable article from a wacko publication. LOL I at least offered genuine rebuttals and argument when you can only descend into terrified name calling&#8230;pathetic.</p>
<p>As for the report about Syrian refugees, you basically rehashed one of your earlier links didn&#8217;t ya? lol. Ah but the writer conveniently ignores whether these newly arrived refugees are Sunnis. Since Syria is a Baathist state, therefore an idealogical brother of Hussein&#8217;s Sunni dictatorship, it&#8217;s likely these folks are former Baathists. It still doesn&#8217;t disprove my point that the number of Iraqi refugees across the Middle East have largely declined substantially since the war ended. </p>
<p>And what makes you so sure we stopped giving aid? Or are we just restricting aid from being used by potential terrorists? Is it so hard to think a place like the one described might be a breeding ground for future terrorists the way the ones in Jordan and the West Bank are? Syria, after all, is a transit point for your heroes in the &#8216;insurgency&#8217;. lol</p>
<p>&#8220;Are you suggesting that Palstinian refugees aren&#8217;t worth considering or counting? It wouldn&#8217;t surprise me if you were given the rabid antiPalestinian nature of most of the regulars here.&#8221;&#8221;</p>
<p>What I&#8217;m saying is that they aren&#8217;t native Iraqis are they? When I spoke of millions of refugees returning home was I referring to Palestianian Arabs? Hmmmm? As for being anti-Palestinian&#8230;what simplistic crockitude, folks here simply don&#8217;t support terrorism. Whether it&#8217;s Hamas, Fatah, Al-Qaida, or Timothy McVeigh (you&#8217;ve got posters of them all, don&#8217;t ya kiddo?). I&#8217;m sure we&#8217;d all support a Palestinian state in the West Bank if we were gauranteed that they&#8217;d be free of terrorists like that pig Arafat. If Hamas would recognize Israel&#8217;s right to exist that might mean something but until your friends get their act together it&#8217;s going to be a hard road for mass-murdering Islamists over there. Not to hard to see eh?</p>
<p>&#8220;And personally, I find it repulsive that companies associated with the ruling clique are making huge amounts of money out of war. If you can&#8217;t see the danger of those sorts of cosy arrangements then you don&#8217;t have much respect for democracy as a principle rather than just a meaningless slogan.&#8221;</p>
<p>The &#8216;ruling clique&#8217; as you simplistically label them seem to be having quite a lot of difficulty passing key points of their agenda aren&#8217;t they? Social security reform was killed along with repeals to the death tax so don&#8217;t be so sure they rule much of anything. As for making money, what are you so offended by? You&#8217;re third world heroes like Castro are worth hundreds of millions.<br /><a href="http://articles.news.aol.com/business/_a/castro-is-worth-900-million-report-says/20060505092609990013" rel="nofollow ugc">http://articles.news.aol.com/business/_a/castro-is-worth-900-million-report-says/20060505092609990013</a><br />Granted it&#8217;s not from war but through the enslavement of his people. I bet it&#8217;s a model you would love to emulate, hey governor? lol</p>
<p>As for Halliburton-good for them. This witch hunt against a corporation is the sort of activity often carried out by folks who don&#8217;t understand and fear capitalism and economics. As long as Cheney did nothing to aid his former employer from gaining contracts, where&#8217;s the scandal? Given that it&#8217;s probably the most scrutinized company in America it would be very hard for them to accomplish fraud undetected so again, where&#8217;s the scandal? Nice try</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s something about your favorite company:<br /><a href="http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2003/12/29/165459.shtml" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2003/12/29/165459.shtml</a></p>
<p>This snippet might interest you:<br />&#8216;So far this year, Halliburton&#8217;s profits from Iraq have been minimal,&#8221; the Times admitted. &#8220;The company&#8217;s latest report to the Securities and Exchange Commission shows $1.3 billion in revenues from work in Iraq and $46 million in pretax profits for the first nine months of 2003.&#8217;</p>
<p>Not the sort profit margin common among war profiteers is it?</p>
<p>&#8220;Your sneering style is annoyingly Sally-like.&#8221;</p>
<p>LOL, you&#8217;re the one to criticize annoying aren&#8217;t you? LMAO!!!<br />And good for Sally. Face it chuckles, you&#8217;re not the victim here. I can argue straight when the other party does. I&#8217;m waiting&#8230;.lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: confusedforeigner		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2006/06/20/by-their-works-shall-ye-know-them/#comment-17443</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[confusedforeigner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jun 2006 21:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2006/06/by-their-works-shall-ye-know-them.html#comment-17443</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Oh and BTW, Halliburton was given US$1 billion to rebuild Iraqs hospitals. &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;So far, nothing has happened and several hospitals have been destroyed by US troops. Nice one Dick.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and BTW, Halliburton was given US$1 billion to rebuild Iraqs hospitals. </p>
<p>So far, nothing has happened and several hospitals have been destroyed by US troops. Nice one Dick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: confusedforeigner		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2006/06/20/by-their-works-shall-ye-know-them/#comment-17444</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[confusedforeigner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jun 2006 21:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2006/06/by-their-works-shall-ye-know-them.html#comment-17444</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[http://www.zmag.org/content/print_article.cfm?itemID=7894&amp;sectionID=15&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;http://www.reliefweb.int/rw/RWB.NSF/db900SID/RMOI-6QCVK8?OpenDocument&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;You&#039;re living in a smug little fantasy land you twit.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;And get this, the US is actively stopping aid getting to refugees in Syria. What great guys. Compassionate conservativism. What a sick joke.&lt;BR/&gt;Are you suggesting that Palstinian refugees aren&#039;t worth considering or counting? It wouldn&#039;t surprise me if you were given the rabid antiPalestinian nature of most of the regulars here.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;And personally, I find it repulsive that companies associated with the ruling clique are making huge amounts of money out of war. If you can&#039;t see the danger of those sorts of cosy arrangements then you don&#039;t have much respect for democracy as a principle rather than just a meaningless slogan.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Your sneering style is annoyingly Sally-like.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.zmag.org/content/print_article.cfm?itemID=7894&#038;sectionID=15" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.zmag.org/content/print_article.cfm?itemID=7894&#038;sectionID=15</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.reliefweb.int/rw/RWB.NSF/db900SID/RMOI-6QCVK8?OpenDocument" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.reliefweb.int/rw/RWB.NSF/db900SID/RMOI-6QCVK8?OpenDocument</a></p>
<p>You&#8217;re living in a smug little fantasy land you twit.</p>
<p>And get this, the US is actively stopping aid getting to refugees in Syria. What great guys. Compassionate conservativism. What a sick joke.<br />Are you suggesting that Palstinian refugees aren&#8217;t worth considering or counting? It wouldn&#8217;t surprise me if you were given the rabid antiPalestinian nature of most of the regulars here.</p>
<p>And personally, I find it repulsive that companies associated with the ruling clique are making huge amounts of money out of war. If you can&#8217;t see the danger of those sorts of cosy arrangements then you don&#8217;t have much respect for democracy as a principle rather than just a meaningless slogan.</p>
<p>Your sneering style is annoyingly Sally-like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
