<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Deconstructing &#8220;nukular&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2006/01/07/deconstructing-nukular/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2006/01/07/deconstructing-nukular/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 12:28:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Epicuros		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2006/01/07/deconstructing-nukular/#comment-8353</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Epicuros]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2006/01/deconstructing-nukular.html#comment-8353</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Nukular&quot; is not the only indication of G.W.B.&#039;s speaking inadequacy! I have listened to his speaches several times and, although English is not my first language, I have detected several mistakes suggesting cultural poverty.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;One impressive passage from a press conference: When a journalist asked GWB a question regarding the Guantanamo prisoners, he responded with: &quot;All I know is that these are very bad people&quot;. No lanhuage erros here but what an educated answer!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Nukular&#8221; is not the only indication of G.W.B.&#8217;s speaking inadequacy! I have listened to his speaches several times and, although English is not my first language, I have detected several mistakes suggesting cultural poverty.</p>
<p>One impressive passage from a press conference: When a journalist asked GWB a question regarding the Guantanamo prisoners, he responded with: &#8220;All I know is that these are very bad people&#8221;. No lanhuage erros here but what an educated answer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Scott A. Edwards		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2006/01/07/deconstructing-nukular/#comment-8354</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott A. Edwards]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2006/01/deconstructing-nukular.html#comment-8354</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Check this out for FREE...&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;This opportunity says:&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&quot;Your Ad&quot; Will Be  Instantly Displayed on Thousands of Websites and Read By Over 10 Million People Per Week For FREE, and It Only Takes 60 Seconds To Get Started!&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;To find out more visit: &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://myviralads.com/?affiliate=8559&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; low cost mlm &lt;/A&gt; site. It successfully exposes FREE information covering Traffic and low cost mlm related stuff.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check this out for FREE&#8230;</p>
<p>This opportunity says:</p>
<p>&#8220;Your Ad&#8221; Will Be  Instantly Displayed on Thousands of Websites and Read By Over 10 Million People Per Week For FREE, and It Only Takes 60 Seconds To Get Started!</p>
<p>To find out more visit: <a HREF="http://myviralads.com/?affiliate=8559" REL="nofollow"> low cost mlm </a> site. It successfully exposes FREE information covering Traffic and low cost mlm related stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2006/01/07/deconstructing-nukular/#comment-8355</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2006/01/deconstructing-nukular.html#comment-8355</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[My humble and linguistically challanged background has no patience for this Southern interpretation of the word nuclear.  That is not how it is spelled. That is not how it is pronounced here in the Blue States...and not how I want to hear it.  The connotations of the word nuclear are far too grave for a &quot;folksy&quot; touch.  I will debate Bush&#039;s intellingence till the day he&#039;s impeached...but I will never accept his pronunciation of this word]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My humble and linguistically challanged background has no patience for this Southern interpretation of the word nuclear.  That is not how it is spelled. That is not how it is pronounced here in the Blue States&#8230;and not how I want to hear it.  The connotations of the word nuclear are far too grave for a &#8220;folksy&#8221; touch.  I will debate Bush&#8217;s intellingence till the day he&#8217;s impeached&#8230;but I will never accept his pronunciation of this word</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: aqualung		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2006/01/07/deconstructing-nukular/#comment-8356</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aqualung]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2006/01/deconstructing-nukular.html#comment-8356</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I believe I said that &quot;I view his inability...&quot;  I guess I don&#039;t get to have an opinion here in neo-con world?  I wasn&#039;t quoting &quot;peer reviewed literature&quot; Bushbot.  If all of us only believed what we read in peer-reviewed literature no one would believe in God, would they?  I guess we all have to think alike here, right Idiot?  No personal opinions allowed.  By the way, when people start throwing around &quot;Sapir-Worf to Pinker&quot; to show how &quot;smart&quot; they are I can only chuckle.  I wonder if Bush has read Sapir-Worf, or Pinker for that matter.  I know he reads.  There was a pet goat book he was fond of as I recall...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe I said that &#8220;I view his inability&#8230;&#8221;  I guess I don&#8217;t get to have an opinion here in neo-con world?  I wasn&#8217;t quoting &#8220;peer reviewed literature&#8221; Bushbot.  If all of us only believed what we read in peer-reviewed literature no one would believe in God, would they?  I guess we all have to think alike here, right Idiot?  No personal opinions allowed.  By the way, when people start throwing around &#8220;Sapir-Worf to Pinker&#8221; to show how &#8220;smart&#8221; they are I can only chuckle.  I wonder if Bush has read Sapir-Worf, or Pinker for that matter.  I know he reads.  There was a pet goat book he was fond of as I recall&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Asher Abrams		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2006/01/07/deconstructing-nukular/#comment-8357</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Asher Abrams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2006/01/deconstructing-nukular.html#comment-8357</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Can you stand one more comment on nukular versus nuclear?&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;The word &quot;nucleus&quot; is, IIRC, an irregular diminutive of the Latin nux, or nut.  The regular form of the diminutive, though, would be &quot;nuculus&quot;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you stand one more comment on nukular versus nuclear?</p>
<p>The word &#8220;nucleus&#8221; is, IIRC, an irregular diminutive of the Latin nux, or nut.  The regular form of the diminutive, though, would be &#8220;nuculus&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nightwalker		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2006/01/07/deconstructing-nukular/#comment-8358</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nightwalker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2006/01/deconstructing-nukular.html#comment-8358</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[AVI said: &lt;B&gt;aqualung, what would the peer-reviewed experimental data be that mispronouncing words is the result of a lazy and uninquisitive mind? (snip)&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Just throwing off a guess like that, without having done the research strikes me as, well, the product of a lazy and uninquiring mind.&lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;He is just repeating what he&#039;s heard others say, and trying to pass it off as fact. It is a commonly-used artifice of whichever segment of the political spectrum happens to find itself out of popular favor at the time; used by both &quot;flavors&quot;.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Remember The Gingrich crowd during the Clinton era? They alsmost invented the talking-points mantra of &quot;Say it often enough and it becomes truth.&quot; I seem to remember that James Carville perfected it, however.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;I can&#039;t tell you how many times that I heard Gingrich and Carville say the opposite thing, repeatedly, as if it were gospel truth, and also in the tone of &quot;My respected opponent must be an absolute idiot for disagreeing with me.&quot;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Back on topic. I&#039;m Southern. I&#039;m not stupid--that I know of. One of the most entertaining things that I&#039;ve ever heard was a happily un-reconstructed Brooklynite whom I worked with telling me how stupid that Southerners were, and how you could tell that just by listening to them &quot;tawk&quot;. He said that in a near-incoherent dialect. He wasn&#039;t stupid either, just ignorant of the issue at hand.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;On a lighter note, we used to really enjoy playing poker with fellows who were new to the South, and who also believed the language stereotype that they had heard all of their lives.  :-)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AVI said: <b>aqualung, what would the peer-reviewed experimental data be that mispronouncing words is the result of a lazy and uninquisitive mind? (snip)</p>
<p>Just throwing off a guess like that, without having done the research strikes me as, well, the product of a lazy and uninquiring mind.</b></p>
<p>He is just repeating what he&#8217;s heard others say, and trying to pass it off as fact. It is a commonly-used artifice of whichever segment of the political spectrum happens to find itself out of popular favor at the time; used by both &#8220;flavors&#8221;.</p>
<p>Remember The Gingrich crowd during the Clinton era? They alsmost invented the talking-points mantra of &#8220;Say it often enough and it becomes truth.&#8221; I seem to remember that James Carville perfected it, however.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t tell you how many times that I heard Gingrich and Carville say the opposite thing, repeatedly, as if it were gospel truth, and also in the tone of &#8220;My respected opponent must be an absolute idiot for disagreeing with me.&#8221;</p>
<p>Back on topic. I&#8217;m Southern. I&#8217;m not stupid&#8211;that I know of. One of the most entertaining things that I&#8217;ve ever heard was a happily un-reconstructed Brooklynite whom I worked with telling me how stupid that Southerners were, and how you could tell that just by listening to them &#8220;tawk&#8221;. He said that in a near-incoherent dialect. He wasn&#8217;t stupid either, just ignorant of the issue at hand.</p>
<p>On a lighter note, we used to really enjoy playing poker with fellows who were new to the South, and who also believed the language stereotype that they had heard all of their lives.  🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Assistant Village Idiot		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2006/01/07/deconstructing-nukular/#comment-8359</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Assistant Village Idiot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2006/01/deconstructing-nukular.html#comment-8359</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[aqualung, what would the peer-reviewed experimental data be that mispronouncing words is the result of a lazy and uninquisitive mind?  I&#039;m pretty familiar with the literature on the language/thought connections from Sapir-Whorf to Pinker (and this is one place where I would be a Chomskyite), but I don&#039;t know of that work having been done by anyone.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Just throwing off a guess like that, without having done the research strikes me as, well, the product of a lazy and uninquiring mind.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aqualung, what would the peer-reviewed experimental data be that mispronouncing words is the result of a lazy and uninquisitive mind?  I&#8217;m pretty familiar with the literature on the language/thought connections from Sapir-Whorf to Pinker (and this is one place where I would be a Chomskyite), but I don&#8217;t know of that work having been done by anyone.</p>
<p>Just throwing off a guess like that, without having done the research strikes me as, well, the product of a lazy and uninquiring mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ymarsakar		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2006/01/07/deconstructing-nukular/#comment-8360</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ymarsakar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2006/01/deconstructing-nukular.html#comment-8360</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Like Arnold Schwarzenigger, Bush carries his accent with him with pride. Precisely because he dislikes emulating his father or anything about him.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;I bet Bush slays himself everyday to realize that he has to clean up his father&#039;s messes. Most people can&#039;t see this because most people don&#039;t see Bush as a person, and that is quite fatal for the enemies of Bush. A weakness I would have taken full advantage of.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like Arnold Schwarzenigger, Bush carries his accent with him with pride. Precisely because he dislikes emulating his father or anything about him.</p>
<p>I bet Bush slays himself everyday to realize that he has to clean up his father&#8217;s messes. Most people can&#8217;t see this because most people don&#8217;t see Bush as a person, and that is quite fatal for the enemies of Bush. A weakness I would have taken full advantage of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: aqualung		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2006/01/07/deconstructing-nukular/#comment-8361</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aqualung]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2006/01/deconstructing-nukular.html#comment-8361</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Of course, saying nukular is only the mildest example of Bush&#039;s discomfort with the English language.  Books have been compiled on his famous malapropisms, mispronunciations and grammatical lapses to the point of incomprehension.  He really can be quite funny as well as very scary when he talks &quot;off the cuff&quot;.  I view his inability to speak correctly without a script to be an example of a lazy and uninquisitive mind.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, saying nukular is only the mildest example of Bush&#8217;s discomfort with the English language.  Books have been compiled on his famous malapropisms, mispronunciations and grammatical lapses to the point of incomprehension.  He really can be quite funny as well as very scary when he talks &#8220;off the cuff&#8221;.  I view his inability to speak correctly without a script to be an example of a lazy and uninquisitive mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: strcpy		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2006/01/07/deconstructing-nukular/#comment-8362</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[strcpy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2006/01/deconstructing-nukular.html#comment-8362</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[When I worked at Oak Ridge National Labs there were a few physics people who said &quot;Nucular&quot; - considering what they did there I would assume few would call them stupid. I also pronounce it that way, when I say &quot;terror&quot; many northerners hear it as &quot;terra&quot; also. Bush sounds absolutely normal to me - very little different from everyone else I know from here (Knoxville, Tennessee).&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;In the few years I spent in academia it could be *really* frustrating that I was assumed retarted. It was funny sometimes when I was, patiently, explained how the software and algorthms I wrote worked (along, sometimes, with quotes from papers I wrote). It was comical to see people&#039;s faces when they found out my name after a 45 minute patronising speech. Even then a large amount of people that are from large northeastern universities would never accept me, regardless of what I did (it was hard to get more credentials than one of my bosses, yet he was not accepted in some academic circles).&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Much as my writing (I&#039;m dyslexic - spelling is difficult) my accent is considered &quot;stupid&quot;. For the most part I&#039;ve learned to live with it, even find quite a bit of amusement from it. People who I think count rarely hold any of it against me. The vast majority have dealt with other accents, other people with some minor learning disability, etc and make thier decision based on the substance of what I say, not how I say it or spell it.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;It&#039;s not that much different than people who look at an African American and think &quot;Stupid&quot; - both are based on something none of us can help and are simply a fact of where (and from whom) we were born. Except that some prejudices are still ok, some are still even right and proper to a group of people. Most of the amusement I find is like some of the above who can&#039;t accept it, but I bet they feel they are quite un-prejudiced and see people for what they are, I&#039;ve seen it to much to be angered by it anymore.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I worked at Oak Ridge National Labs there were a few physics people who said &#8220;Nucular&#8221; &#8211; considering what they did there I would assume few would call them stupid. I also pronounce it that way, when I say &#8220;terror&#8221; many northerners hear it as &#8220;terra&#8221; also. Bush sounds absolutely normal to me &#8211; very little different from everyone else I know from here (Knoxville, Tennessee).</p>
<p>In the few years I spent in academia it could be *really* frustrating that I was assumed retarted. It was funny sometimes when I was, patiently, explained how the software and algorthms I wrote worked (along, sometimes, with quotes from papers I wrote). It was comical to see people&#8217;s faces when they found out my name after a 45 minute patronising speech. Even then a large amount of people that are from large northeastern universities would never accept me, regardless of what I did (it was hard to get more credentials than one of my bosses, yet he was not accepted in some academic circles).</p>
<p>Much as my writing (I&#8217;m dyslexic &#8211; spelling is difficult) my accent is considered &#8220;stupid&#8221;. For the most part I&#8217;ve learned to live with it, even find quite a bit of amusement from it. People who I think count rarely hold any of it against me. The vast majority have dealt with other accents, other people with some minor learning disability, etc and make thier decision based on the substance of what I say, not how I say it or spell it.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not that much different than people who look at an African American and think &#8220;Stupid&#8221; &#8211; both are based on something none of us can help and are simply a fact of where (and from whom) we were born. Except that some prejudices are still ok, some are still even right and proper to a group of people. Most of the amusement I find is like some of the above who can&#8217;t accept it, but I bet they feel they are quite un-prejudiced and see people for what they are, I&#8217;ve seen it to much to be angered by it anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
