Comments on: An apology? Not good enough!

By: Rick J

Rick J — Sat, 03 Mar 2007 07:00:00 +0000

I have been following a site now for almost 2 years and I have found it to be both reliable and profitable. They post daily and their stock trades have been beating
the indexes easily.

Take a look at Wallstreetwinnersonline.com

RickJ

By: tequilamockingbird

tequilamockingbird — Sat, 03 Mar 2007 07:00:00 +0000

Yeah, Bush is a sweetie, all right. Good thing he's a uniter, not a divider.

tequilamockingbird

By: Ymarsakar

Ymarsakar — Sat, 03 Mar 2007 07:00:00 +0000

As you can see, if Bush wasn't as sweet as I portray him as, he would be a lot better at countering propaganda like Tequila's.

But Bush can't even get out the gate in this respect.

And that's a bad thing for the War on Terror, it means more people will die and the war will be longer. Maybe as long as Vietnam, with a final victory at the end of the decade.

It is a good thing that the basic strategy doesn't require Bush to do much... but that's a secret, don't tell the Democrats that.

By: tequilamockingbird

tequilamockingbird — Sat, 03 Mar 2007 07:00:00 +0000

I've read several suggestions lately from both sides of the divide as to how Bush can re-energize his second term the way Ronald Reagan did. Perhaps one thing that would help would be a statement something like "I've been telling the American people that no one in my administration was involved in illegally disclosing the identity of a CIA operative. My heart and my best intentions still tell me that's true, but the facts and the evidence tell me it is not."

tequilamockingbird

By: terrye

terrye — Sat, 03 Mar 2007 07:00:00 +0000

I suppose they could always use one of Saddam's iron maidens.

Maybe that would suffice.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 03 Mar 2007 07:00:00 +0000

You should have forwarded this form letter apology to the Whitehouse to lighten its load:

http://www.karmafarm.com/formletter.html

By: AcademicElephant

AcademicElephant — Sat, 03 Mar 2007 07:00:00 +0000

Ymarsakar: I'm not so sure Bush is as sweet as you fear, and, in any case, the cabal came in to the office as usual this morning so I think we're in pretty good hands vis a vis the war.

As for Reid, he and Dodd are really out of control. Since Fitzgerald didn't give them what they wanted in the investigation, they go on the Sunday talk shows and demand the Republicans just hand them Cheney and Rove. It's pathetic.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 03 Mar 2007 07:00:00 +0000

So, the Democrat Party is doing all it can to cover Joe Wilson’s rotting lies? Covering Berger’s National Security theft? Defending Sowcrofts insane poicy of ‘stability’? What’s next an appology for not hiding our pigs, our women, our Christians/Jews/Hindus/Atheists?

I will NEVER forget the Democrat Party’s treason.

By: camojack

camojack — Sat, 03 Mar 2007 07:00:00 +0000

Sorry is, as sorry does…

By: David Thomson

David Thomson — Sat, 03 Mar 2007 07:00:00 +0000

At this very moment, only a few people like myself clearly see the obvious absurdity of a trial. The consensus view will soon be that a prosecutor will not be able to convict Scooter Libby. No jury will unanimously find him guilty. I suspect that all this nonsense should cease in a few weeks. Does anyone disagree? If so, please explain why.