neo-neocon » Blog Archive » Tengo una remera del Che y no sé por qué…

What is it with you Right-Wingers and your hatred for Liberalism?

Liberalism

The French Revolution (1789) introduced Europe to a new guiding idea, summarized in the phrase “Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood.” It was an uprising of racially inferior elements who took over ideas that in part had entirely different racial origins, and could only be perverted by them. The Jews had a decisive influence. Like the Church, liberalism taught that all people were equal, that there were no value differences between the races, that external differences (e.g., body type, skin color) were unimportant. Each person, regardless of race, might be a hero or a coward, an idealist or a materialist, creative or useless to society, militarily able, scientifically able, artistically gifted. The environment and education were the important elements that made men good and valuable. If one provided the proper environment and freed people from their chains, the peoples would join to develop their abilities in a unified humanity, and eternal peace would result. Therefore liberalism demanded equality for all, the same opportunities for everyone, in particular the Jews, equality and freedom in the economic sphere, etc.

We Germans have seen where such doctrines lead. Liberalism tore down the structures that held races and peoples together, releasing the destructive drives. The result was economic chaos that led to millions of unemployed on the one side and the senseless luxury of economic jackals on the other. Liberalism destroyed the people’s economic foundations, allowing the triumph of subhumans. They won the leading role in the political parties, the economy, the sciences, arts and press, hollowing out the nation from inside. The equality of all citizens, regardless of race, led to the mixing of Europeans with Jews, Negro, Mongols and so on, resulting in the decay and decline of the Aryan race.

All that Nordic civilization had won from the powers of darkness in the areas of culture, science and freedom was threatened at the instant when the Jews and other inferior elements gained power. A result was the collapse of European domination in the world as the result of the World War, and the danger of the decline of the best of the German peoples, the Germans. Adolf Hitler alone rescued Germany and all of Europe from this fate.

More:

Der Reichsfé¼hrer SS/SS-Hauptamt, Rassenpolitik (Berlin, 1943)

The Racial Question and World Propaganda

We told our opposition often enough that although we were using its weapons and rules for our purposes, we had nothing intellectually or politically in common with them. To the contrary, our goal was use these means to put and end to them and their methods, to finally eliminate their theories and policies. Both in theory and practice, National Socialism opposes liberalism.

Just as liberalism after the French Revolution had various effects on every nation and people, depending on their nature and character, the same is true today for the forces that oppose it. German democracy was always a particular playground of European liberalism. Its innate tendency towards excessive individualism was foreign to us, which lost it any connection to real political life after the war. It had nothing to do with the people. It represented not the totality of the nation, but turned into a perpetual war between interests that gradually destroyed the national and social foundations of our people’s existence.

More:

“Rassenfrage und Weltpropaganda,” Reichstagung in Né¼rnberg 1933

For the record, I’m over 40 and I’ve traveled on 4 continents including over 20 countries. I’ve been all over the place. I’m neither ashamed nor proud of my nation in any personal sense, although certainly I find some parts of our history shameful and some parts honorable. As for the point about Canada and Australia, the Pew study wasn’t about immigration per se, but more about attitudes around the world. They asked people from a number of countries where they would want to move to in order to improve their lives. I don’t think the study had much to say about actual immigration numbers. My point about “beacon of liberty” was to simply say we shouldn’t idealize our own history or image. As far as Western democracy, I certainly don’t scorn it. I traveled enough to know the “nice” places in the world to live. Have I seen the opposite? Yeah. I don’t just travel to France to hang out with my liberal idealistic buddies on my many trips. I’ve seen some serious poverty in Asia, I’ve visited more than a couple of dictatorships, and I’ve seen some tense situations in Israel, the West Bank, and Egypt. I once had two body guards assigned to me by the local police chief in Egypt’s Western Desert. I could go on, but really I just wanted you to see how off your guesses were. What I don’t get is how you can make all these assumptions about me and tell me I don’t comprehend reality. I think admission is a good thing, especially when it comes to parts of our history that are shameful. Shouldn’t we have some kind of memorial in Washington to, say, African slavery, the way the Germans built a memorial to the Holocaust in Berlin? I also like reflection on those parts that are honorable. On one of my trips to France, instead of hanging out with my liberal idealistic buddies, I toured the coast of Normandy. If you haven’t seen it, you should go. Each of these villages fly flags of the invasion forces; could you imagine a French village with American flags all up and down the main street? When my brother was stationed in Bosnia as a peacekeeper, he sent me a great email about the gratitude he felt from the local people for the work he was doing as an American soldier. I was proud of him for that.

Having said all that, I think what disturbs me most is the incredible animosity I see today between liberals and conservatives. Frankly, I can’t stand conversations with other liberals because of their complete confidence in how wrong conservatives are. And why must I, if I call myself a liberal, be absolutely wrong to you?

I was not trying to insult you. Your views and insights bring balance, but not harmony.

It’s me again, anonymous (8:20). This whole multiple anonymous thing is getting confusing. Maybe I should come out of the closet. Anyway, you said,

“why stop with just one President, why not look at the School of Americas under the watch of a whole bunch of Presidents? The school of the America’s makes Abu Ghraib look like a day care center under the direct supervision of the ACLU, Red Cross and a local chapter of the PTA combined. Why f*** around with some beltway sleaze and backstabbing and even a burglary authorized by a President when you can have narcoterrorism, right wing death squads and the corruption of drug money running all the way to the top?”

Exactly! Thanks. That’s all I wanted, just some admission. And by the way, I don’t call myself an idealist, although I won’t take it as an insult, which seems to be what you intended. I like to think of myself as reasonable. As far as why people are begging to come to our country, I’d say it has a lot to do with improving their lives, particularly in the economic catagory. A recent Pew research study found that Canada and Australia are now the most popular destination for people who want to leave their home countries to improve their lives. I’m just not buying that U.S. as “beacon of liberty” thing anymore.

What in the hell makes people act this way?

I’ve been guilty of it myself!

Voluminous postings on foreign policy! Folks who know the real honest-to-goodness TRUTH! The HISTORY OF EMPIRE distilled into interminable rants!

Where’s the shrink when you need her?

a)You should control your anger. You are not looking very good.

b) I don’t know or can imagine from where you got the idea that most immigrants come to USA running from… er…USA. I do know many immigrants apart from been one myself and I know nobody that fits your description. As a matter of fact I do know many people that came here running from opression, communist oppression like the one your idol Che helped install in Cuba.

c)Cuba is 90 miles from Key West and some mutual influence between Cuba and USA is nothing but natural. I really don’t know what is your point in this regard.

d)Could you elaborate in how USA caused misery in Haiti?

The Evangelical private schools I attended, taught us that Roman Catholicism led to totalitarian philosophies.

Many Orthodox Protestants think Roman Catholicism is the soil Fascism grows from.

Ever heard of the Inquisition, from 1200 A.D. to 1800 A.D. . . ? It’s never mentioned any longer. We hear a lot about the Jewish Holocaust when 6 million Jews perished under Hitler. But most people don’t know that Hitler was a Roman Catholic and an instrument of the Holy Office. Hitler was never excommunicated for his crimes against humanity and causing the deaths of millions of people; whereas Martin Luther was excommunicated for translating the Bible into German.

From:
The Reformation & The Inquisition

—————————–

And then there is this!:

What follows is an accurate chronology of United States involvement in the arming of Iraq during the Iraq-Iran war 1980-88. It is a powerful indictment of the president Bush administration attempt to sell war as a component of his war on terrorism. It reveals US ambitions in Iraq to be just another chapter in the attempt to regain a foothold in the Mideast following the fall of the Shah of Iran.

From
Arming Iraq: A Chronology of U.S. Involvement

Whatever his complexes, Khomeini had no qualms about sending his followers, including young boys, off to their deaths for his greater glory. This callous disregard for human life was no less characteristic of Saddam Hussein. And, for that matter, it was also no less characteristic of much of the world community, which not only couldn’t be bothered by a few hundred thousand Third World corpses, but tried to profit from the conflict.

From:
The United States and Iran-Iraq War 1980-1988

WOW!!! Hussein and Khomeini sound like a certain Texan Cheerleader

“the communists, nazis, fascists and terrorists just can’t help themselves — they were and are forced to slaughter millions because “we” RADICALISED THEM TO NO END.”

It’s you who are in a “Bizaroo World” for putting communists, nazi’s, facsists, and terrorists all in one pot. And for what purpose, to make us look good?

First of all an idiot like yourself would never consider that Nazi’s and other facsists were helped to power and sustained by us (the west), the most powerful, TO KILL MILLIONS OF COMMUNISTS, TO KILL COMMUNISM. This is German history (in fact 20th century history), I suggest you read it.

No wonder then that the Communists did everything they could to stop western backed fascism, even if it meant forced labour to build up their military industrial machine THAT THEY KNEW THEY WERE CERTAINLY GOING TO NEED. This is Russian history, I suggest you read that too.

Islamic terrorism was again something nurtured by the west to fight communism. This is American history, read it. But like the other anti-communist Frankenstein’s we helped create (bring to power), “creating” them proved far easier then getting rid of them. Read today’s newspaper.

This is my interpretation of history, in it’s chronological order. If you have an argument or another view-point I’d like to hear it…

“He’s not against war, notice — he’s just on the other side.”

..is not the response I was looking for, an utterly ridiculous assumption, but typical of the un-educated, pumped up, “ugly” American that I find here, in
Neo-neocons intellectual cesspool.