To find out more, visit my making money from the internet site. It successfully covers FREE information exposing FREE traffic and making money from the internet related stuff. Don’t forget – FREE, FREE, FREE. You have nothing to lose!

You’ve got veterans who refuse to allow today’s GI’s to suffer what they suffered. You’ve got veterans who refuse to allow today’s GI’s to suffer what their fathers suffered.

You’ve also got civillian non-veterans who were quiet during the vilification and demonization of the military during the end of the Vietnam war, and I think that they have decided to speak up this time and refuse to be cowed or be quiet.

I don’t think those are the only reasons, of course, but I do think they have a large part of this picture.

Kalroy

I usually do not respond to someone like Ho. And I apologize for taking over Neo-Neocon post. But I could not help but find that Ho Chi Minh (the commenter) exceedingly annoying and arrogant. He simply brushed off grave injustice as an acceptable cost – part of the process toward socialism. The absense of humanity and compassion is simply shocking. Of course my respond is intense because it is a issue of great emotional value to me, something that Ho simply cannot comprehend.

As far as Ho goes–I respect his right to “go at” whomever he wants, even though I disagree with him, as long as he doesn’t cross over into troll territory (he borders on it, but so far has not entered it). But I actually found the incredibly condescending manner in which he treated Minh Duc quite disturbing. Although I choose to be polite on my blog, I don’t think that terms such as “pernicious idiot” (“pernicious” meaning “exceedingly harmful,” and “idiot” as in the phrase “useful idiot,” meaning “a person who makes excuses for totalitarian leftist states and is thus passively complicit in their wrongdoings) is very far out of line at all.

Minh Duc has in fact had experiences in the areas about which Ho spouts some incredibly naive and relativistic verbiage. The thread in question is here. I wonder why Ho decided to use Ho Chi Minh as a nickname; I assume it’s because he’s some sort of hero of his.

Ho (the commenter, not the historical figure), is the sort of person whom David Horowitz was describing when said the following, if [they] were to pause for a moment and then plunge their busy political minds into the human legacies of their activist pasts, they would instantly drown in an ocean of blood.

As for the caliber of Ho’s arguments, I’m with this commenter on another thread.