<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Traveling again	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2005/04/24/traveling-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2005/04/24/traveling-again/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 07:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Pat		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2005/04/24/traveling-again/#comment-594</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2005/04/traveling-again.html#comment-594</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The need/ability to ride the train varies a lot with location; almost nobody rides them in the Western US.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;On safety issues it&#039;s always useful to do a cost/benefit analysis.  If you can save a life for $10,000, obviously it makes sense.  If it costs $200,000,000 per life saved, then you&#039;ve got to wonder.  &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Of course, leftists typically hate this kind of cold-blooded analysis, but it is the only rational way to compare risks.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Ironically, this also implies that US safety standards should be higher than European standards, because the value of a person is higher in the US.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The need/ability to ride the train varies a lot with location; almost nobody rides them in the Western US.</p>
<p>On safety issues it&#8217;s always useful to do a cost/benefit analysis.  If you can save a life for $10,000, obviously it makes sense.  If it costs $200,000,000 per life saved, then you&#8217;ve got to wonder.  </p>
<p>Of course, leftists typically hate this kind of cold-blooded analysis, but it is the only rational way to compare risks.</p>
<p>Ironically, this also implies that US safety standards should be higher than European standards, because the value of a person is higher in the US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Paul		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2005/04/24/traveling-again/#comment-595</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoneocon.com/2005/04/traveling-again.html#comment-595</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I love to ride the train and I hope that someday the powers that be realize that we need them and upgrade the rail system.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love to ride the train and I hope that someday the powers that be realize that we need them and upgrade the rail system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
